Last week I read a quote from Calzaghe stating that he was really up for the challenge. He said that fighting Hopkins in his backyard with three American judges and an American ref make this all the more of a challenge. Is Calzaghe stupid? Can't he get nuetral judges and a ref? He has the clout and I hope he uses it. I would really hate to see another ODH vs. Sturm. Was Calzaghe just talking or is that how it is going to be?
It won't matter who the ref is or who the judges are. This one won't be close. Then again.... Lewis-Holyfield 1 wasn't close either. ( I hope it's not a draw !)
Fact is, the bigger the challenge, the better Joe performs. Simple as that. I think it's his way of saying he's gonna put on a masterclass which NO-ONE can argue with. Expect to see the best JC yet.
I like Joe, but this is a bad matchup for him , style wise. Crazy decisions happen everywhere, I really don't think any one country has a premuim on them. But it won't be a factor. Benards careful , thread the needle style will give Calzaghe nightmares. I don't think Hopkins will need any help from the judges.
He isn't complaining. Where did you pull that bull**** from? Joe is simply acknowledging the fact that twisted decisions are not uncommon and in order to prove himself he needs to box the **** out of Hopkins to get a convincing win, which he will do.
I do believe that Calzaghe can beat Hopkins on a level playing field but if he has to fight the ref also AND has a set of crooked judges he has a slim chance of winning this one without a KO and I doubt he will get that with his fragile hands.
2 cards will be close, one will be wide-ish. No matter the judges. Like 116-112 115-113 115-114 (yeah, I'm into the business of predicting the cards now) As much as I'd like Hops to turn back the clock a few years, even the Hops that dismantled Tarver has too low a work-rate to be able to deal with Calzaghe's. I still reckon Hops will hold his own though, having his little moments of tricky moves and ring expierence showing. Won't be enough in the end, unfortunately.
I was thinking today, who has Calzaghe beaten that can even come close to a master like Hopkins? But thinking about it more, who has Hopkins beaten that comes close to Calzaghe. ODLH was undersized and given they were the same size I think ODLH woulda outboxed him. Tito is too 1-dimensional. Wright was too old and stylistic matchup favoured Bhop. Tarver looked like crap. The only opponent that resembled Calzaghe in a way of great boxing skills with speed to boot was ODLH and he was simply too small. I mean bare in mind Hopkins was outboxed by Taylor and even lost some rounds to Howard Eastman...I dont rate Kessler & Lacy too much either. This fight is too confusing to analyse and I really would not bet on it.
the judging will be important because i think there will be a lot of close rounds... i think the ref is even more important, though... in his last fight, i felt that robert byrd gave b-hop a lot of latitude in the way that he manhandled winky with his "professional" tactics... which ultimately frustrated winky and got him off his game