True, but doesn't mean he'd win, its hard to pick, both come foreward fighters, extreme agression from Hatton, slicker offence from Joe. both have good chins.
Calzaghe. He has it all he could brawl, box, defend, he can fight any style. He is one of few fighters who can adapt to any style.
Isn't this a question that answers itself? Calzaghe has more facets to his way of fighting than Hatton. Calzaghe could box from flyweight to heavyweight with his styles and still be successful - whereas Hatton can only be successful at 140.
Was Mundine vs Kessler a fluke or Kessler vs Calzaghe? Or is the real answer that Mundine improves exponentially for each year?
