What ****ers are you refering to? The ignorant boxing fans - the ones that thinks that a boxer is totally **** because he loses one fight? Are those the ones you are refering to? There is a reason that this match is one of the most wanted matches in boxing. Yes, Eubank was quality. I have never said totherwise - I disputed the fact that 20 defences on its own should be regarded highly regardless of quality.
Kessler is probably the most dominative fighter in the world right now, who else has lost so few rounds? In reality he may well be one of the top 3 fighters in the world right now. It is time to get that message out perhaps?
And what better way than to remove Calzaghe as the reigning champ? A fighter that you and I find very unappreciated and underrated.
Your strategy of hyping MK is advantageous to you cause in every eventuality. If he beats JC...well, JC has been beaten by one of the very best. If JC beats him...JC has beaten one of the very best. It's WIN WIN. Only question is...does MK need the hype...and if he indeed does, cand he be hyped amongst those that don't have eyes to see?
Of course it is advantagous, but it is totally justified. I'm sure people will see that just by looking at his stats a previous fights.
I have never said that all those 20 defences didn't hold quality - just stated that just because its 20 defences doesn't necessary mean that the quality was there in all of them. If you say they did, then I don't know what to do with you.
Ok then, go on believing that a shot Eubank was a big win for Calzaghe - but unfortunataly it will lead to fact that you´ll have to double your daily dose of antipsychotic medication when Kessler drills Joe a fine new *******.