Bika - young blood - yeah he is young but nothing but a good journeyman. As for Kesler's opponents - by your very sientific standard Kessler has: 6 former or reigning worldchampions on his record - but then again in your book standards aren't the same when judging Kessler as when judging Calzaghe... Calzaghe has had good opponents - he has fought most of the best out there and props for that. But he has also fought guys that didn't deserve even being in the same ring with him - Ashira, Bika and Manfredo being the latest.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Nothing new here - you're still a liaer, bonehead Calzaghe has only fought 7 former champions (but offcourse you're counting future champions as well - like Manfredos and similar). The first was Eubanks in october 1997 and the last one was Lacy. But maybe you have counted some EBU, WBO Asian Pacific, or a Paraguayan SM Title. To compare with this Kessler has fought 6 former/present champions (WBC,WBA,IBF or WBO) and he has done that since nov 2002.
Funny thing how Eubanks fought in weightclasses above SMW before and after the Clazaghefight - and lost twich to Carl Thompson (but I guess Calzaghe ruined him) Another funny thing is that Calzaghe was favourite with the bookies, when Eubanks was so well prepared - But I guess they just realised his greatness even before you did... Btw - the 9 champions and former champions - you do you count there? - I can't get it to more than: Eubanks, Reid, Woodhall, Brewer, Mitchell and Lacy - but I might very well have missed some (I'm tired as hell )
No we don't - my mistake. So it's 6 to 6 and Kessler has done the same since 2002 as Calzaghe has done since 1997.
Don't expect Blocky to give you the missing names. He will do as he always does when proven wrong namely ignore the thread and post his false claims somewhere else instead.:roll: Just like when he claimed Kessler had never earned over a million dollars for a fight. I don't think he has yet admitted to be wrong about that. It must be hard to be so deluded that you are incapable of admitting you can be wrong.:-(
Yeah that seems to be the everlasting case - and then you can start all over once again. Then again, its always kind of funny, and not frustrating at all. I'd still hate to be in Blockys shoes, if Kessler wins though. He has got alot of explaining to do. I won't accept that JC was shot or the like.
Nope, Blocky has secured himself on that front. He has made bets about leaving the forum for good, and he has stated repeatedly that he won't admit he was wrong if Kessler should win, because he can't post on the forum anymore due to the lost bets (as if he couldn't make a final post, but I guess he is as small a person in defeat as he seems to be... well all the time.:roll: ) He has promised though, that he will write an article for eastsideboxing (again:roll following the fight, wherein he will give Kessler credit, if Kessler should win a fair victory. I seriously doubt Blocky will ever think Kessler won fairly though, even if Kessler KTFO Calzaghe I'm sure Blocky will have seen something wrong in Kesslers victory.atsch
He counts Inkins interim title, and then he must count Kessler as two, because he is double champion thereby making it 9.
No, he´s not replaceable - there´s only one Blocky! But I am afraid that I hit his soft spot last night by mentioning his addiction to antipsychotic medication(which is very possible), as it seemed he left the forum imediately. Anyway it worries me that I haven´t seen any posts of his today. Oh well, if I were right he´ll recover and hopefully come back even stronger......:yep