Calzaghe vs. Toney, Jones, and Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Nov 17, 2008.


  1. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    First of, he didn't need to be as active against Vanderpool because Vanderpool didn't don anything to make him and if you really watch the fight when Vanderpool tried to get more busy, hopkins picked the pace up. Hopkins always fought depending on the way the opponent he faced fought. Look how busy he was against Johnson? He had to be because of Johnson's pressure and he could do it becuase his legs, stamina, and speed were better. Now he has to pace hisself. He's just one of the very few fighters who still has perfect boxing technique at his age, so it makes up for the lost of tangibles he had before.
     
  2. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Calzaghe very slight favourite over Toney.
    Slight underdog against BHop.
    Looses most rounds against Jones.
     
  3. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Note the "capability" aspect of my original remark. He was actually pretty sparing with Tarver. He was much more active with Winky. Anyway, I address the overall significance of Bernard's 'prime' and what it would mean in all areas in the post where I respond to your initial post. Having full mobility makes a tremendous difference in all areas.
     
  4. margo82

    margo82 Active Member Full Member

    906
    0
    Sep 24, 2008
    Calzaghe would beat Toney, but mosts of his shots would be parried, it would be enough to take a points decision.

    Calzaghe beats Hopkins in a similar fashion to how he already has.

    Jones beats Calzaghe, probably about 116 - 111.
     
  5. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004

    That is why it is tough to call a Hopkins prime. I have no problem with people saying Hopkins wins, but it is by no means cut and dry. Prime Calzaghe is a good deal faster than the one that is around now. The drop in hand speed from just the Lacy fight to Kessler fight is glaringly obvious.
     
  6. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008
    I don't think Calzaghe was much faster. Infact he's even a better boxer now because he's more adaptable in the ring, which makes him more difficult to beat. I definetly don't see any big difference in speed. There's more of a difference in Hopkins speed, than his, that's for sure.
     
  7. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Hopkins was landing unnatural, poorly executed punches against Pavlik in a generic effort to keep throwing. Hopkins was sucking wind in that fight. Sadly, I know you're correct. Some people actually can't see the difference between the machine like youthful Hopkins who's arms moved like a piston with tireless brilliant fast footwork, and the cagey old man around today.. Sad but true.
     
  8. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    Calzaghe adapted long ago to his hand injuries, nothing in that regard has changed from Lacy or the few fights around the period. If you cannot see the difference in hand speed from the Lacy fight to the Kessler fight, I don't know what to tell you.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Calzaghe was faster than Hopkins in overall speed with a 7-8 year age advantage when they did actually fight. I see no possible chance that Calzaghe having slightly more speed, and Hopkins having significantly overall faster movement in all areas makes any sort of difference in favor of Calzaghe.
     
  10. JoeyP

    JoeyP Member Full Member

    378
    1
    Aug 12, 2004
    I think Joe's weakness is that he can get sloppy at times throwing all those punches---against a deadly counter puncher as Toney, this would be a huge mistake and Toney wins this one.

    I picked Jones and Bhop as well.

    JoeyP
     
  11. Monticello

    Monticello Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,012
    1
    Apr 2, 2008
    I'm going with Jones and Hopkins beat Calzaghe in their primes and Calzaghe beats Toney.
     
  12. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    292
    Sep 23, 2008
    Coulnd't have said it better.

    Too bad there's no option for this choice in the poll. :twisted:
     
  13. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Calzaghes style is made for Toney. Toney is the most deadly sneaky counter puncher out of the three. Calzaghe lunges in. How many people have we seen Toney murk jumping in on him. Calzaghe would catch some mean right hands. I see Calzaghe winning rounds on workrate but his punches will have 0 effect on Toney while Toney's counters would get Calzaghes attention early. Toney is the most likely to knock him out. Jones beats him, possible KO probably not b/c Jones would use his legs. Bhop and Joe would of been a war that I see Bhop coming out on top b/c Joe would get knocked down probably once or twice. He will get up and finish and probably win 6 rounds.
     
  14. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Against a prime Jones -Jones by UD .

    He just beat the best version Of Hopkins he could have faced ..

    And a with Toney is a pickem fight ..Imagine how many missed punches are in this fight ?
     
  15. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    He looked quicker vs Pavlik than his early fight vs Taylor