Is Calzaghe without his speed and endurance a very limited fighter technically?How good would he be if his speed and endurance were not as good as they are?
thats such a stupid question,it would be like saying how good would tyson have been if he didnt have his power or his speed,or how good would lewis have been if he didnt have his height and jab.atsch he'd be a club fighter though
Stupid thread mate. You could say that about anyone. If someones crap at somthing would he be good?atsch
If not for his speed and endurance he would've been stopped by Hopkins and before that probably Eubank and that other cat that put him on his ass.
You know, a similar question entered my head a few days ago, I was asking myself if Roger Federer would still be #1 in the Tennis world if you took away his ability to hold a racket.