Calzaghe's legacy if Kessler Loses tonight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by USboxer1981, Nov 21, 2009.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,568
    16,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    Agreed that his win against Hopkins was more important. That was the most important victory of his career.

    As for the performances against Lacy and Kessler being "better"....

    Well, if by "better" you mean the fights were not as close, then yes. I agree.

    But if by "better" you mean 'more impressive', I disagree agree.

    Calzaghe was beating Hopkins in the battle of adjustments and for me, it don't get much better than that.
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    You're a preferred poster of mine, Rumsfeld, but I'll wholeheartedly disagree with that. :lol: I see you have already conceeded most people would tend to disagree, so I don't want to seem annoying.
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,568
    16,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, everyone is entitled to an opinon.
    :good

    I really don't understand that, though. Mind you, I'm one of the few people who loved the Hopkins-Calzaghe fight. A lot of people around here dubbed it as "boring". I was fascinated by the tactical warfare we witnessed where there were subtle adjustments and counter-adjustments being made throughout.

    I didn't think Calzaghe would have too much trouble with Kessler but I thought he was going to have all kinds of problems with Hopkins.

    For me, that was the one fight that sealed Joe's greatness in my mind.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Calzaghe's lack of genuine scoring is the problem for most people, you have to figure. Hopkins has always had tremendous defense, but he's no-where-near as unhittable as Calzaghe made him look. I think right there alot of people decided Calzaghe was never as good as they thought he might have been. That was a very disappointing performance by both fighters, but more so Calzaghe. Hopkins made a fool of himself with his antics and posturing, but he still came off as a world class operator. Calzaghe, not so much.. Calzaghe did however prove once again that he had a will to win second to no other, even if he didn't have the tools. We'll always appreciate Calzaghe for his fighting intensity. Few fighters could ever compare in that department.
     
  5. T-smooth

    T-smooth Member Full Member

    406
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    For those who love Calzaghe so much that they say he "beat down Kessler" is BS! Kessler slept good that night while Calzaghe was up all night taking pain medication. Calz took wayy more punishment in the fight but he outworked Kessler. He did hurt kess to the body in rnd 8 and landed a good combination later on but that was about it! All I'm trying to say is Kess took no beating from calz and he shouldn't have anything to lower his confidance from that fight being that Kess won the last round of that fight. Calz resume will be deminished after ward spanks Kess cause Calz did no spanking of the such to kess but Roy Jones is another story!
     
  6. T-smooth

    T-smooth Member Full Member

    406
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    san Rafael is Right On AGAIN! I still believe those shot Calz threw at Hops were low that why calz hump Hop right after the first one landed which seemed kind of Odd unless he Knew hops was going to be in that position if indeed hit him low *WHICH HE DID*. I Didn't think Calz landed anything except for three punches which took place after round 9
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    yeah, THANK YOU

    4 belts, he had 1- 25%
    WBO being the **** belt and not even recognized for 20 years
    he fought the best the WBO put in front of him....
    i cant believe how some people seem to forget that "the best" had the other belts....and he never fought them in the 90s
     
  8. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009

    That is a solid take.

    The common response in Vegas was basically questions about BHOP's age, suggestions he should retire, and wonder that he was still boxing at all. No one even noticed Joe as being a champion or a meaningful opponent. Joe's weak performance made no impression nor gained him any (US) fans. Hop looked soft in his conditioning, and old and tired in his performance, while Joe appeared slightly fresher but quite amateurish and unskilled.
     
  9. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    It makes me laugh how people have agendas here.

    I'd like it, just in my own perfect world, if everyone could put things into perspective like Rumsfeld.

    Calzaghe fought a very good version of Kessler a couple of years ago and beat him going away in a competetive, entertaining fight. I don't see how this can ever be diminished given that Kessler hardly lost a round before facing Joe.

    Calzaghe has some superb wins on his record that are all too easily dismissed.

    The fact that the OP suggests that Calzaghe's stock will fall if Kessler loses tonight is completely ridiculous. What if Ward goes on to be a 5 weight world champion and top 3 p4p fighter of all time? If that happens and Ward just nicks the fight tonight on points, does Calzaghe go with and above Ward?

    No, of course not.

    Watch the fights for what they were. Calzaghe vs Lacy/Kessler/Hopkins especially are significant examples of how good he was. Enjoy that and forget spurious all time great rankings that mean ****.
     
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,568
    16,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    This is not true at all.
     
  11. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    the reason why the thread was started and why kessler's legacy affects joe's so much is that joe never fought a proven world class fighter in his prime.
    for kessler to take this tournament, it would lend weight to joe's legacy.
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,568
    16,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's not very often someone says that.

    :lol::good

    Like I've said, I think Ward WILL beat Kessler tonight but that in no way diminishes my view of Calzaghe.

    I realized it a little later than I'd have liked, but Calzaghe was a world class fighter. I do wish I could have seen him step up his level of competition earlier, but I do not blame him (I blame Warren). Nothing--and I mean NOTHING--can take away from Calzaghe's accomplishments in the ring.
     
  13. the_brigand

    the_brigand I'll Eat Her Later... Full Member

    3,906
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    if Kessler loses to Ward and then ward ends up winning the tournament, and maybe to have a legendary career of his own, it might not be that bad for Calzaghe. Calzaghe's legacy does not hinge on just one fight.
     
  14. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    it pretty much hinges on one fighter now, but it's not as if it's 'fate' that has brought calzaghe's legacy to this point, is it?
     
  15. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009
    Actually it is quite true. Would you feel better if I spelled it out more explicitly?

    "Joe's weak performance made no impression nor gained him any
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    (US) fans."

    Because that IS the truth. To this day you can't find a material number of US sport fans that can identify Calz or his profession. In a multiple choice quiz bet on famous "brand of pizza" coming up 9 to 1 over professional boxer.