They all did better jobs against the same opponents didn't they? Calzaghe doesnt have 20 world title defenses he only has 3 defenses of the IBF and he didnt defened WBC/WBA. HE defended his intercontinental title allot of times but that doesnt count as a world title does it? Its a shame it took him so long to get his shot at a world title, he was ready to fight for world titles long before 2006, even beat some ex-champs
Yeah true ! i forgot to mention all the ex world champions he beat ! ah well u can only beat wats put in front of you ! :bbb
You're the 1 who is new to boxing, WBO isn't a real world title, neither is the WBU that Ricky Hatton held, so no Hatton didnt have 20 world title fights either. He beat some good opposition when he had this WBO inter-continental thing, ex-champs, think he managed to fight 5 or 6 top10 opponents in the world in those 10 years so nothing wrong with it, just not a real world title
oh yes of course. All he needed was Chad Dawson i guess.......then when Chad would have lost his resume would have taken another hit.....but then again 'they' woulda all kept mentioning Chad lost before Calzaghe to Johnson when Johnson was like 40. ..............:blabla
No Mayweather is linear champ (unless he lost that retiring), Mosley is the rightful IBF/WBA unified champ (IBF stripped but hes) and is unifying against the WBC titlist, hes linear if Mayweather isnt (a puzzling 1). WBO is just a minor title, good to win but not a real world title Pacquaio isn't a real Welter champ
Beating Michael Jennings doesn't make you a real world champ, sorry, neither does beating an ancient Eubank who hadnt beat a top 10 SMW in years
Youre just a JC hater ! ....and you odviously know **** all mate Eubank had lost two close decisions to Steve Collins prior to fighting JC and was only 31 ... Chris Eubank had defended both WBC and WBO titles since 1990 so how you can say he hadnt fought a top 10 fighter in years is beyond me !