Calzaghe's thoughts on the year - "I was really in trouble against Jones"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by yorkshire_boy, Dec 20, 2008.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    What do you think this is, bub? An argument with your wife? Get the **** out of here with this ****.
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    It was "so obvious" that Calzaghe won that ESPN, Yahoo Sports, the Associated Press, and Setanta scored it for Hopkins. ****ing moron..
     
  3. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    No, the mistake Hopkins made was forgetting he's 89 years old. He's not a slick young battle cat anymore. There's no Mr. Calzaghe this, or Mr. Pavlik that. I said ANYONE. The geezer can only afford to fight one way at this point. He had to learn the hard way. These are his words.
     
  4. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    faking low blows to get the win, come back when you have watched abit of boxing son
     
  5. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    LOL @ this CRYBABY **** about faking low blows.. Hopkins was trying to get point deductions as well as buy himself time. He fought a mindless fight. Hopkins was a ****ing IDIOT. Now keep making it obvious that you drink Calzaghe's nut straight from the tap.. **** Hopkins. DICK RIDER.
     
  6. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    your no dounts one of the most stupid posters on thes ite i don't give **** about joe calzaghe but i don't like morons such as yourself trying to change what happened in fights because your gutted your old man couldn't do anything against calzaghe. Your obviously biased and stupid as your calling me a crybaby for saying about the low blows then in the next sentence saying he faked them and needed to as he needed time as he was tired your to stuipid for words. Come back when you can post something worth reading until then get back to making up stories and get back to your gay fantasy.
     
  7. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    133
    Nov 22, 2008
    Bernard spoiled the fight, Bernard lost the fight. He would of still lost if he opened up offensively because Calzaghe is totally different than Pavlik. Joe would have won by a much wider margin if that had been the case. I put some blame on Cortez for allowing that much holding. Before and after the fight I did not feel B-hop could neat Joe but he could still have a good chance at beating most the top fighters and he showed that by dominating Pavlik. Joe's style is too much for anyone. He throws too much, never gets tired, and can take huge shots, though he really hasn't been hit much compared to other fighters. The endless arguments about him always come down to U.S. vs U.K. at the core and they are pointless. If you're an objective observer it's not too hard too figure out. I personally like both fighters and think they are great.
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Hahaha...
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :blurp

    Look it's an "objective observer." ^
     
  10. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    If he was mindless and wasn't throwing punches what the **** was he doing to win the fight and get Joe 'bashed up' as you put it earlier?
     
  11. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Didn't I tell you to not come at me with this INFANTILE ****?
     
  12. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    :patsch:patsch, can you not read your own posts ****wit
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    I can't read your posts, that's for ****ing sure.. Goddamn ******.
     
  14. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    Little tip: Dont spout INFANTILE **** and I won't be able to throw it back at you.
     
  15. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    :nut