Campbell-Bradley ruled a No Contest/ Almost come to blows!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beenie, Aug 24, 2009.


Page 1 of 19
  1. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    The CSAC has reportedly overturned Timothy Bradley's win against Nate Campbell and has ruled it as a "no contest." I'm glad to see that the correct ruling was passed and maybe now this will trigger talks of a rematch.


    Edit: It's reported that Campbell and Bradley nearly came to blows after their hearing with the CSAC. Bradley reportedly heckled Campbell by yelling "you got away with quitting." Nate replied with some smack talk of his own and approached Bradley and removed his jacket. The commotion was broken up before any punches were exchanged.

    This has the makings of a juicy rematch. :yep
     
    Beenie, Aug 24, 2009
    Beenie, Aug 24, 2009
    #1
  2. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    BULL****........

    ****en crybaby ass mutha****a
     
    freddy-wak, Aug 24, 2009
    freddy-wak, Aug 24, 2009
    #2
  3. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Bradley beats him anyway in a rematch.
     
    evalistinho, Aug 24, 2009
    evalistinho, Aug 24, 2009
    #3
  4. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    viva the king
     
    walk with me, Aug 24, 2009
    walk with me, Aug 24, 2009
    #4
  5. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
    No rematch is needed. Nate would have gotten his ass handed to him and he knew it. Quitting was the better option in his mind.
     
    TroubleLurks, Aug 24, 2009
    TroubleLurks, Aug 24, 2009
    #5
  6. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    :lol:

    Classic Freddy. :good
     
    Axe, Aug 24, 2009
    Axe, Aug 24, 2009
    #6
  7. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Reeeeeeeeeeematch!
     
    BlueApollo, Aug 24, 2009
    BlueApollo, Aug 24, 2009
    #7
  8. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,372
    555
    Sep 14, 2008
    Yep:yep
     
    CLUBBER, Aug 24, 2009
    CLUBBER, Aug 24, 2009
    #8
  9. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Disappointing comments fellas. :-(

    I'd personally would love to see how this fight would play out in a rematch.
     
    Beenie, Aug 24, 2009
    Beenie, Aug 24, 2009
    #9
  10. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    def should rematch. im glad this was a nc. to be fair those cuts were the results of headbutts not punches. campbell deserved this decision even though his actual boxing showing in the first few rounds was sub par
     
    Auracle21, Aug 24, 2009
    Auracle21, Aug 24, 2009
    #10
  11. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    you gotta think don king pull some strings to ensure this result
     
    walk with me, Aug 24, 2009
    walk with me, Aug 24, 2009
    #11
  12. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    All i know is Campbell don't have the Diaz, Cotto, Vitali ( vs Lewis when he had a nasty cut) and more warriors heart when the going gets stuff after being cut.
     
    rayhogan, Aug 24, 2009
    rayhogan, Aug 24, 2009
    #12
  13. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008
    I don't care if there will be a rematch or not as long as the correct ruling (NC) was already handed down... It's good to see boxing rectified some of its mistakes...
    .
     
    buxzer, Aug 24, 2009
    buxzer, Aug 24, 2009
    #13
  14. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    This shouldn't be a no contest, Campbell was looking for a way out, and great timing for this decision. Just more bull**** coming Boxing's way now. It was obvious that Bradley was kicking his ass and in the corner Campbell's eyes got all wide and he wanted to get out of there and started screaming like a ***** to stop the fight. Campbell isn't a warrior he's just a ****ing *****. Cotto wasn't screaming to stop the fight he just smiled and continued to fight through it. That's how fighters should conduct themselves and Cotto's cut was much much much worse than ***** ass Campbell's cut.
     
    DemolitionDan, Aug 24, 2009
    DemolitionDan, Aug 24, 2009
    #14
  15. DeanoFlash

    DeanoFlash Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,021
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    How many times do I have to keep saying this. Campbell suffered a vitreous hemmorhage. That has nothing to do with the cut, that means his eye had internal bleeding. He's 37, at some point there are more important things than being a "warrior".
     
    DeanoFlash, Aug 24, 2009
    DeanoFlash, Aug 24, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 19