Campbell-Bradley ruled a No Contest/ Almost come to blows!

I wouldn't call it a "manly conversation," CX7. It's a bit "unmanly" to try and referee internet arguments though.

 

OK, THIS ^ is why this **** only gets the atsch smilie. Complete ****ing waste.. COLOSSAL IDIOT right here.

 

I disagree.

Nate Campbell has been shortchanging not only the fans but himself for a long time now, and the frustration has been building ever since the first Peden altercation. He talks so eloquently that you'd expect him to carry his intelligence into the ring, but for some reason, it never seems to be the case. There should be no dispute over whether the ruling of the No Contest is justified or not. The rules clearly state that if four rounds are not in the book and the fight is stopped due to a injury caused by a headbutt, it must end with a No Contest. This has now came into effect.

What I question is the character and legitimacy of Nate Campbell's claims that he could not continue. The reason I brought up past events is because I feel that play a central role into why the fans have turned against him. They get all of this talk and when it comes to fight night, Nate Campbell quits on his stool effectively. The events with Peden and his failure to make weight are absolutely central to the backlash of the fans, because it has just built up the frustration of Nate Campbell and his start-stop career.

 

You take about ten minutes to come up with some lame insult and don't back anything up. You argue like a child and then call someone else 'unmanly'! You're looking like a complete mug, but are too stupid to see it.

 

Have you said ONE ****ing thing? Just ONE thing, *****? You keep talking about insults and smilies and you're NOT SAYING ****. I figure that probably has something to do with the fact that YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE **** YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, and you're a sore little VAGINA. Let's go back to your first post addressing me - an unsolicited INSULT.

STFU, you sniveling little *****. You're as STUPID as you are WHINY.. ****ing woman..

 

I hear ya. I'd appreciate it if you didn't call me ***gy for what I said, though. If it's between posters I like and respect (you and addie), I sometimes try to calm things down. But if it annoyed you, sry for that. You guys can knock yourselves out. :good

 

I won't lie, I'm dumbfounded by everything San Rafael is saying at the moment.

 

:thumbsup

 

lmao... Now you now how I feel when I see you lecturing these guys about Cambpell's "character," and all sorts of other unrelated strangeness having to do with his "history" and everything else..

 

All I'm saying is that I question whether or not Campbell could have continued. I think the Peden and Funeka incidents riled a lot of Boxing fans, and they may have been contributing factors as to why he isn't getting the benefit of the doubt this time around. I thought it was all fairly obvious.

That said, at least I try and explain my position, whereas you just go off throwing insults at people.

 

Yes, finally, let's go back to the beginning - you've avoided it for too long.

You were the one throwing insults - I didn't insult you. Then you posted two sentences which didn't make sense. I questioned you and all you've done since then is act like a little ******. Not once have you tried to explain your flawed reasoning - just attempt to sound hard (that's failing miserably by the way).

All you can do is throw pathetic insults about, because you know what you said what pure pish and you look doubly the **** because you were trying to call someone stupid at the same time.

 

It was changed to an NC because the commission believed the head butt caused him to see spots. They saw the hospital reports most likely. (not sure at all but would be wise of them to see them).



They thought the head butt caused the vitreous hemmorrage, thus a NC.

 

I'm gonna keep my mouth shut, Addie. I don't want to end up taking heat again because of what you two mother****ers are arguing about. :twisted:

 

Nope. I return insults to those firing the first shot - but I admit I gave Hud a hard time - for the first time. And the difference here between us, is you and your far out theories, and me and my crap - but you're the only guy talking out of the side of your neck at me. Do the math. I wasn't agreeing with you, but I didn't have to say a word about it. You did..

 

If you look back the history of this thread, I refuted from getting into a verbal altercation with Rafael the moment he told me to "SHUT THE **** UP". He doesn't seem to be in the mood for an adult conversation at the moment, but it's dumbfounding, I always perceived him to be a fairly good poster on the General Forum. Strange.