Campbell-Katsidis unlikely......

Exactly, just trying to promote a fight, so why the f*ck would people believe anything that is said on face value. Your post just totally contradicted itself. If Don King told you someone was avoiding his fighter would you just believe him because he is the promoter? Personally, the promoter is one of the last people i would ever believe, as they have an invested interest.

 

hahaha. Bad post. Diaz pulled out of the fight with Katsidis, just like Guzman did as well. Get your facts straight. Campbell is carrying two of the belts which would make Katsidis the unified champion, thus making it a rewarding fight. Katsidis has earlier in his career taken fights on multiple occasions WITHOUT pay, to increase his exposure and further his career. He is the epitomy of a warrior, who fights to be THE BEST HE CAN BE. Have a look at the precedent and then use some common sense FFS.

 

Your the idiot, throwing down unsubstansiated rumours on the site, to push your won obvious agenda. Not all of us are that gullible. There could be an absolute TONNE of reasons as to why they wouldn't make the match, most notebly that they are probably already in negotiations with another fighter, or waiting until after the casamayor fight to fully evalutate all of their options. Don't be so short sighted.

 

campbell will school katsidis nuts into oblivion.. there is nothing special about katsidis..

 

:-( You have not seen Katsidis fight have you!

 

Nothing special about katsidis ay ? ur a funny guy mate ,how bout the list below .

1.huge ko power with both hands .
2.high workrate.
3.tough as nails.
4.mentally very strong ,has proved to be able to fight through adversity. unlike baby bull who shut down after his cut vs nate.

katsidis would hammer peden ,yep the same peden who obliterated nate TWICE.:yep Already candidate for being in fight of the year twice.

KATSIDIS IS A GREEK ****ING WARRIOR.

 

i have.. katsidis is a slugger who often gets hit.. he can box for sure but nate campbell will **** him up.. struggling against graham earl does not make you special.. and he was miserable against czar amonsot

 

he disposed of graham earl inside of like 6 rounds if im not mistaken. his performance against czar was actually quite good, with his face in the condition it was in, people just take to much away from czar who has an iron chin and would of had a bright future if was not for kat punching holes through him.

 

I think your underestimating Katsidis, although some flaws, he has developing qualities, least of all his amazing work rate and stamina but also his power counterpunching skills and ability to make fighters uncomfortable and sloppy with his constant pressure. His ability to take punishment then dish it out harder is a 'special' quality for sure.

Nate has impressed me further, but your assumption that he would school Katsidis is clearly unfounded.

 

kod earl in 6,first guy to beat earl that convincingly, katsidis ended earls career, what are u on mate?struggling my ass. MISERABLE VS CZAR? ur kidding mate ,fought czar with one ****ing eye for twelve rounds ENDING CZARS CAREER! CZAR WILL NEVER FIGHT again.he has ended the career of the last two guys hes fought ,now he will end cassamayor too. i wana know what drugs ur on buddy ,just so i can steer clear of them ,i love reality to much.:yep

 

:huh
guess what bud.. i like katsidis' style but i don't think he could become a top dog at lightweight..
he will lose to nate campbell, juan diaz, and even julio diaz (not sure about d. diaz though i think they're even)
he will get past casa cause he is old..
he gets hit too often..i rest my case..

 

You really aren't the sharpest knife in the draw, are you? He said it was a rumor. You do know what a rumor is, right? And he never said anybody had to believe him, did he? Lol, you really are a rocket scientist! As far as his "invested interest".......yeah, you're right about that. But he's got you interested and paying attention now, doesn't he sucker?:yep

 

Kat is a good fighter and I"d still LOVE to see him and Diaz go at it!!

 

Sure it was only a rumour. So do you think if i went around to your family and friends and told them i had heard rumours that you had been caught sexually molesting young children, it would not effect your life in the slightest? Rumours are enough to have someone charged with defemation, and can be especially serious in certain situations. This guys obvious intention was to get people to believe him, otherwise he wouldn't have posted it. All i did was point out that it was a stupid rumour, with no source to back it up, and very high chance of being incorrect. You haven't made a valid point, all you have done is highlighted the fact that you are extremely naive, and resort to childish antics to try and make a strawmans arguement. Next time think before you post, because you are looking very foolish right now.