CAMPILLO-cloud = MARQUEZ-pacquiao 3? DISGRACEFUL ROBBERIES...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Doc, Feb 18, 2012.


  1. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    I think the Pac Marquez decision was more contoversial because of outside factors like Marquez being given no chance to win and a lot of people thought he won the second fight too.

    Added up it was hard on Marquez and i think that's why people were so incensed. Having to wait four years for that.


    As for the actual decision, at least it was close. If they had Pac winning a UD it would have started a riot.

    As for the Campillo fight. Disgraceful robbery.
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    exactly.

    even compubox sided with campillo whereas compubox sided with pacquiao.
     
  3. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    The discrepancy on points may have been about equal in each loser's rightful favor, but JMM-Pac 3 was much more competitive.
     
  4. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    Only fight in recent memory that was as big as a robbery was Wlodczyck vs Palacios

    ****ing pathetic and this is the 3rd time he's been robbed when he clearly won. poor guy, it'd be hard to keep fighting with that BS....dude fights everyone in their backyards and schools them then gets shafted. ****ing disgusting.
     
  5. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    This..
     
  6. Calamaro

    Calamaro Member Full Member

    154
    0
    Feb 8, 2011
    Campillo-Cloud, Campillo-Shumenov and Campillo-Murat I are all worst than Pacquiao-Marquez 3, and I had Máquez winning on 2 points. A disgrace.
     
  7. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    And this :deal
     
  8. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    JMM vs Pac was close, i had it even, the fact that JMM dominated the rounds he won and Pac scraped his, in addition to the fact that he was a huge underdog, meant people thought juan won clearly.

    Haven't seen cloud fight
     
  9. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Nah. Campillo-Cloud was way worse. Not as bad in my book as Williams-Lara, but bad.
     
  10. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Yes you are.

    :deal
     
  11. Spitfire7

    Spitfire7 Gadfly Full Member

    4,498
    2
    May 18, 2007
    Bad comparison.

    Some people can't just move on... :-:)patsch:lol:




    But Campillo-Tavoris is a f'n disgrace! :fireLara-Williams is the more apt analogy.
     
  12. Cotto(e)

    Cotto(e) Guest

    ROGER MAYWEATHER on Pacquiao-Marquez III:

    This content is protected


    That's from Roger - a guy that hates Pacquiao more than the OP and most Mexicans. The fight was close. Controversial decision, yes, just like their first 2 fights. Robbery? **** no. If the fight had been Marquez-Gatekeeper (a no hoper expected to be blasted out), and said Gatekeeper gave exactly the same performance as Pacquiao did, then people would say the fight was very close and the SD well-deserved.
     
  13. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    You're a ****ing massive idiot if you think JMM got robbed after watching the gift Tavoris got over Campillo. :rofl. That was a real robbery last night and only emphisized what a close, compeitive fight is which JMM and Pac have always produced. Get a grip doc.....or go see a real one.
     
  14. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Floyd sr said something similar.