Can a fighter become a GREAT if he NEVER beats one prime HOF-class opponent?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Oct 3, 2010.


  1. zoo

    zoo Active Member Full Member

    1,424
    2
    Sep 14, 2006
    Great yes, but never top 10, or even top 20 ATG.
     
  2. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    A fighter can only beat his contemporaries - HOF'er or not. If he beats the bests of his time with no BS then he is great in my book.

    There's no way to conclusively compare two fighters from different generations. In boxing styles makes fights and anything can happen. Just beat the best of your time. Simple as.
     
  3. agila2004a

    agila2004a Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,675
    0
    May 14, 2006
    i agree,but what will you call a boxer goes on temporary retirement / vacation or doesn't have the urge to fight other available fighters of his time?
     
  4. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    It depends and varies, but one has to fight or challenge himself to a great fighter before his career ends.
     
  5. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    I was reading thorugh to see if anyone posted this. Good work.

    cant belive it took so damned long.

    They obviously had to beat enough oipponents to be considered this way which is why i do not understand this smarmy ignorant **** of a thread starter.:lol:
     
  6. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Neither Haglar nor Hopkins ruled over a particulalry strong middleweight division. What they did is win, win, win, and then win some more.

    The guy in my avatar was 2-2 against fighters I'd call great, but he snagged a few zeros, dropped guys like ya shot 'em in the head, and fought anybody, anyplace, anytime.

    Not everybody can be an Arguello, a Robinson, or an Ali, but there is more than one way to define greatness.
     
  7. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I like your answer.
     
  8. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    Hall of famers true but none of them were in their prime.
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    I was waiting for some desperate Calzaghe haters to try and discredit the best SMW ever, but you fail because Joe beat Hopkins, the then Ring #3 P4P fighter who was Ring LHW champ inbetween his biggest wins of Tarver, Wright & Pavlik, and clearly.
    Calzaghe also beat Jones when he was still a Ring top 10 LHW and beat Eubank.

    But yes a fighter can become a great without a HOFer on the record.
    Hopkins did it by beating smaller fighters past their peaks.

    Sven Ottke did it by beating alot of solid opposition in 22 title fights.

    Often you have 2 top level fighters who dont have a HOFer on either of their records but get the status by fighting each other (For the winner)
     
  10. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    You didn't just list Mike McCallum. :yep
     
  11. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    he asked a valid question and was provided an answer. you don't have to like that answer but considering how terrible and biased a poster you are i won't be offended :rasta
     
  12. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
    Hehe indeed but it's not that the bros didn't fight greats, they are scrapping the floor for what's left of the decent HW in today's division
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: I get the impression you guys think you have come out with some really clever answer here, but really it's not so at all, just some pretty reductive, infantile, weak logic.

    The opponent would already have "became great" by beating other HOF-class fighter(s) and therefore proving himself as having the ability to do so. What is remotely difficult to understand about that? :huh

    It is very, very unusual for there to not be any HOF-class fighters around for anyone to fight. Wladimir Klitschko seems to have fallen into this extremely rare hole where there genuinely aren't any around, so as of now he seems to be destined to never have the opportunity to prove he can cut it at that level. But the vast, vast majority of formidable champions do have the opportunity to test themselves against fighters of proven similar standing.
     
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    This is probably the best response so far. I'm swayed towards agreement I think.
     
  15. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Yes. There are a number of ATGs who never beat anyone great, mostly because they just weren't available under the circumstances. Jofre, Loi, Galaxy, Lopez, etc. If they're able to dominate good to decent competition over a long period of time, they can still get there.

    Besides, how many guys who HAVE beaten ATGs have only beaten them when they were either way past prime or way above their best weight or both? I mean, Bernard Hopkins comes to mind there.