can anyone show me the quote where Hopkins said he won't fight Joe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Nov 20, 2007.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,956
    17,350
    Jul 19, 2004
    Show me the quote then, **** face.

    :smoke
     
  2. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,672
    102
    Jan 27, 2007
    coming from a guy who thinks beating winky wright at LHW is bigger and more impressive than unifying the division against kessler at SMW.

    :nut
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,956
    17,350
    Jul 19, 2004
    Ahh! Yes!

    Because Kessler was an all-time great!

    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  4. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    "**** face"?
    proust?tolstoy?dawkins?
     
  5. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,672
    102
    Jan 27, 2007
    because winky was such a danger up at LHW! he looked so at ease and ripped!!

    :nut

    didn't you also say leading up to the cal-kessler fight that kessler was the more complete boxer of the two?
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,956
    17,350
    Jul 19, 2004
    This is a nonsensical argument that reeks of desperation by the Calzaghe faithful. Essentially, in most pathetic fashion, you all try and vindicate your ridiculous beliefs by overstating Calzaghe's resume whilst downplaying any and all others. This is a tiresome, boring tactics that lacks any real merit, just like most of the 'arguments' pushed forth by you and like-minded fools.

    Yes, and I maintain he's the more complete boxer of the two. I also predicted a Calzaghe victory.

    Do you have an actual point?

    :smoke
     
  7. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,672
    102
    Jan 27, 2007
    it's the ****ing equivalent of calzaghe fighting cory spinks, an awkward little southpaw who does his best work about 2/3 divisions down. but mythical hopkins can get away with such hilarious mis-matches.

    his resume is no better than calzaghes. both have good resumes, but nothing overly special.



    yep, you're deluded if you think old man b-hop can beat a true elite between 160-175 anymore.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    BHop has been constantly underrated, he might not be an odds-on favorite against JC, but he is a live underdog. Also, BHop can beat abunch of elites between 160-175.

    you're just a hater and its painfully obvious. Winky was an elite at 160, and BHop beat him comfortably. Tarver was an elite (when BHop fought him), and he annihilated him like Calzaghe beat Lacy.
     
  9. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I think both sides are testing the waters to see how many chips the punters (e.g. duffers like us) will give them in the negotiation stakes...all these moves are preambles to the dirty, which I think they will end up doing, for a lot of money...

    Bhop: I am a legend, you are just an elite

    Joe: Shut it, Oprah...it's those golden taps I'm interested in

    Bhop: Look at the names on my resume...whom have you ever danced with...Manfredo?

    Joe: Shut it, Pops...you are old, damaged goods, but good enough for me to tart up my shabby resume with in the eyes of those American clowns...anyway, Pavlik is better and would do more for my legacy...after all, he KTFO the man who beat you twice...

    Bhop: Screw you...I can fight Jones for almost as much money at less risk! And Pavlik is a bluff - he's due to starch Taylor again...damn that kid!

    Joe: Hey, Clinton, you said you had big tits, didn't you?

    :dead
     
  10. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,672
    102
    Jan 27, 2007
    who?

    calzaghe?
    dawson?
    kessler?
    pavlik?