Can Calzaghe reach 50-0?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Asterion, May 11, 2008.


  1. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    I think that his 45-0 is more impressive than Marciano's 49-0 or that Ricardo Lopez 51-0.

    But can Calzaghe fight 5 more times and win those fights?

    5 fights would take Calzaghe two years (his last 5 fights were done from March 2006 until April 2008 ), which would mean he has to fight until he's 38 years old.
     
  2. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Calzaghe should fight Jones and 4 more easy contenders at 168 or 175.

    He should stay away from Dawson and Pavlik.
     
  3. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Nah, he holds a massive stylistic advantage over Pavlik. He'd take him apart. Dawson, however, would be an extremely tough fight. If it happens in a year or more, I'd probably go for Dawson.
     
  4. smoochp

    smoochp Da flyest1 Full Member

    4,082
    0
    Mar 1, 2008
    Nah, because Jones will get him his first L
     
  5. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    I don't think he'll fight enough of fights to get to 50-0 before he retires.. Only potential opponents I can see him fighting now is Roy Jones or even Chad Dawson, and both of those fights could be possible losses.. He'll probably fight on or two more and then retire..
     
  6. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    I agree. Pavlik is made for Calzaghe but Dawson would be a pain in the arse.
     
  7. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Marciano's record was impressive because he was a heavyweight where people get KOed all the time.

    Unless Joe has fought the very best he could have, remaining undefeated don't mean a huge amount.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    400,298
    82,142
    Nov 30, 2006
    This post was going so well until the penultimate word. :yep
     
  9. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Whats wrong with "and"?
     
  10. joe the great

    joe the great Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,453
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    He might beat Pavlik but take him apart? With that sissy slap stuff of his. Please!
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,129
    11,159
    Jan 6, 2007
    If his rate of decline continues, he would have trouble with Pavlik a year from now.

    Especially if Pavlik continues to improve.
     
  12. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    :lol: are you aware that Marciano was a small heavyweight?
     
  13. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,129
    11,159
    Jan 6, 2007
    He can take both those guys at this point.

    And what would be the point of fighting five non-contenders just to get to fifty?
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    400,298
    82,142
    Nov 30, 2006
    In that context it was unnecessary. :yep Dawson is the only guy that may rock Joe's scissors.
     
  15. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    No way in HELL is JC's 50-0 even good enough to wipe the butts of Finito's 51-0-1 or Marciano's 49-0 record. NOT EVEN CLOSE.