Can Fury be an ATG?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ellerbe, Nov 28, 2015.


  1. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    He doesn't need Haye, Haye is a joke right now.
     
  2. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,097
    5,569
    Nov 5, 2013
    Why not? Lol.
     
  3. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    Well the HW division is pretty weak right now, just like Wlad, to be considered an ATG Wlad had to dominate for a length period of time. If Fury only dominates for like 5 years would he still be ranked among the greats?*
     
  4. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    37,898
    7,495
    Sep 2, 2011
    There's no way Fury dominates for the next five years, he's getting beat in his next five or three fights even.
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    BUT if he does, is he an ATG, it's a hypothetical question. I see Wilder stopping him, and Joshua literally killing him.
     
  6. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    37,898
    7,495
    Sep 2, 2011
    Yeah but that scenario is so unlikely it's not even worth a thought. :lol:
     
  7. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    37,898
    7,495
    Sep 2, 2011
    If Haye came out of retirement against Fury now, I'd pick Haye. This was styles guys. Although not to take too much credit away from Fury, he's pretty good.
     
  8. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,211
    6,762
    Jul 21, 2009
    Too early to tell. We'll know in a few years.
     
  9. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    Fury is an amazing boxer, it's possible he beats all of those guys, I just don't see it happening. The guy has legit skills, clearly the most skillful boxer in the HW division.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,161
    78,443
    Nov 30, 2006
    Absolutely not. Flukiest HW champ since Neon Leon.
     
  11. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    yeah that's what I've been saying, wlad was dominant when he had the reach advantage, and his opponents were coming forward. fury took away his bread and butter, Haye, Povetkin etc are far better at coming forward.
     
  12. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    So if he dominates for the next 5 years, and beats Wilder, Joshua, Povetkin etc goes undefeated you wouldnt rank him as an ATG? What about Wlad?
     
  13. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,721
    15,256
    Jul 25, 2014
    :lol: eat your crow IB, i might have picked wrong, but I stated Wlad's age, and cited his struggle against Jennings several times.
     
  14. Maximus

    Maximus TKO6 Full Member

    3,787
    1,508
    Apr 29, 2011
    No, and for the same reasons I disregard Wlad. He's a huge guy with skills, and will always outmatch a smaller guy with equal or similar skills. We don't see that in any other division (thankfully), so either create a Super Heavyweight division or stop comparing fighters of the past to genetic freaks.
     
  15. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    I just made a thread about this. If you look historically at the careers of boxers who have beaten top 25 ATG's while they hold a belt, about half of them go on to become top 25 ATG's themselves. Most of the rest are in the top 50 all time. Only Douglas and Leon Spinks are clearly outside of the top 50. And their wins alone still put them in the top 100 imo, as bad as they were outside of the one fight.

    People aren't realizing how good a position Tyson Fury is in, if he can exercise any self discipline at all and be a bit of a consistent champ. Wlad had to labor for years to become an ATG because he didn't beat a clear top 25 ATG. He became a top 10 guy through sheer dominance and longevity. Fury doesn't have to do anywhere near that to become a top 10 guy. He'd be justly considered a top 10 ATG if he a. beats Wlad in rematch b. beats Wilder to unify the belts for the first time ever (for this many belts) c. have maybe 4 or 5 more successful defenses over 3 or 4 years after that. and d. retire undefeated at 32 years old. That is ostensibly doable, and his resume would easily be in the 5-15 ATG range at that point. He could do it a few other ways too.

    All that said, I think he'll have a Ridck Bowe or Evander Holyfield type career. I think he'll be 15-30 ATG range, maybe unify the belts, beat some real great contenders, but lose to some people he shouldn't and at least one person he should who becomes a more dominant champ (maybe Joshua).