Can I see your MW list? Top 10, 15, 20, whatever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Mar 2, 2009.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,696
    30,597
    Jun 2, 2006
    Greb had tortures making the weight for Walker and fought a very conservative figth by his standards , at least for the first half of the fight I read that he lived on orange juice to make the weight and had to run around the local reservoir the day of the fight to make the limit.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,824
    Mar 21, 2007
    I heard that too, the weight-struggle. But the point is, if Greb is good enough to beat Walker (top 5-12 MW by general concensus), and Flowers, a few months later, is good enough to beat Greb - Flowers must be pretty good.
     
  3. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008

    As much as the 'Greb' debate pisses me off...... alternatively, makes me look a dill, dont the reports suggest Greb was close to BLIND in one eye, post Walker???
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,824
    Mar 21, 2007
    He was blind in one eye for the Walker fight.

    Greb just gets more astonishing the more you learn about him.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,696
    30,597
    Jun 2, 2006
    Greb was blind in one eye after the Kid Norfolk fight in 1924.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,824
    Mar 21, 2007
    Norfolk took no ****, that's for sure.
     
  7. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008
    Maybe its a bonus..(being semi-blinded).. be buggered if I'd be willing to see 'Tiger', or Mickey Walker's crude facials prior, mid-event or post fight.
     
  8. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,641
    735
    May 22, 2007
    I was gonna add Ketchel to the honourable mentions every time I post this list ppl ask me about Ketchel. Langford and Fitz are difficult to rate I have Langford top 3 at light heavy and top 20 heavy. I should probably mention Fitz but can't decide who to leave out.

    Hopkins was great at ths weight and had the consistency and title defences but Burley's resume is much better at the weight.
     
  9. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,941
    8,600
    Feb 11, 2005
    1. Greb
    2. SRR
    3. Monzon
    4. Hagler
    5. Hopkins
    6. Burley
    7. LaMotta
    8. Flowers
    9. Walker
    10. Les Darcey
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,824
    Mar 21, 2007
    Speeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaakkk to me!
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,824
    Mar 21, 2007
    So you leave Langford out? I think that is what I am going to do. Not 100% comfy with that though. Ketchel, 11-15?

    What about Ezzard Charles? Would you rate him at 160?
     
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    I try not to rate fighters before 1900 with those who fought after. The only reason being that my knowledge of that era is very lacking. I know of Dempsey, and I know of his reputation as a great fighter, but very little true knowledge about him. Don't know enough about Gibbons either.

    I don't try to rank Langford by divisions. These lists are hard enough as it is without trying to find a good place for Langford according to what he did at that specific weight.
     
  13. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,732
    365
    Jul 12, 2007
    In order (but really just a scramble to make 15):

    Monzon
    Hagler
    Greb
    Burley
    Hopkins
    Walker
    Tiger
    LaMotta
    Cerdan
    Giardello
    Gibbons
    Benvenuti
    Fullmer
    Williams
    Darcy
    Zale
     
  14. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,641
    735
    May 22, 2007
    Charles would be top 20 around 15. Yeh Ketchel would probably be 12 or 13 seems a little low but my ranking always change so he may move up.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,696
    30,597
    Jun 2, 2006
    I normally rate those that formally held the title as Champ ,then make a seperate list ,I mean what do you do about
    Burley
    Langford
    Gibbons
    Darcy
    Charles
    Williams??????

    Archie Moore had some good wins here too!
    Then you have to factor in old time middles like Fitz, Ryan , Dempsey, its a night mare.
    I used to think the Lightweight s were the richest division ,but Im not sure now ,and think of all the great LHVY's!