Can it be credibly argued that Calzaghe has a deeper resume than Mayweather?

During this thread - https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...retired-undefeated-get-all-over.727413/page-5 - @Glass City Cobra claimed that Calzaghe could be credibly argued as having a deeper resume than Mayweather. Can he?

 

Agreed Flo, please do vote.

 

@Glass City Cobra, I think you're going to have to make the argument you claimed could be made if you're going to reverse this early trend of voting.

Or, at least vote for the argument you made, to avoid the poll being a whitewash.

 

To help settle a difference of opinion.

Specifically, to determine the majority view on whether a credible argument can be made for Calzaghe having a deeper resume than Mayweather. What say you?

 

I was also a huge Calzaghe fan, Matt. I agree he can be underrated.

I'd like to see someone try to make an argument that his resume was deeper than Mayweather's, though. Like you, I don't believe it could be done credibly.

 

It certainly would Smoochie.

I think in a comparison of top 5 wins Ward would come out on top, whereas a comparison of 6th to 20th best wins would favor Joe.

It would be whether you value quality of best wins or depth of resume more highly.

 

Agreed Janitor, please do vote.