Can Jermell Charlo redeem himself from his embarrassing loss to Canelo?

Oh Shad.... you're entitled to your opinion, even though I strongly disagree.

 

Yeah you and elmaldito. But hey if it happens you can try to sell me that fight too!

 

I don't sell people on fights. I express enthusiasm in regards to events related to the sport of boxing.

 

AKA as the fight seller.. yes I know!

 

You made that part up yourself.

 

It's ok, you're on the PBC payroll to hype those type of fights on these forums.

 

Wanting to see those two fight and claiming it was some sort of history making event are two entirely different things.

The people that bought into the whole undisputed vs undisputed propaganda are simple fools who drunk the Kool Aid. For all of your misdirection above, through this and other threads the facts speak for themselves. That was not undisputed vs undisputed. The second the bell rang Tim Tszyu was the WBO Champion at 154. That is a fact and is not up for debate.

Therefore, despite the hype this was not in any way an historically important fight as you repeatedly claim. It was a run of the mill Canelo title defence against a guy who was outgunned, outworked and outclassed. The undercard was nothing out of the ordinary despite your pivoting to it not being a historical fight but a "historical event" and no amount of word salad, misdirection, outright lies and hypothesis that you have been dribbling in here will change that.

This is a fight that will be forgotten soon enough and when people dissect Canelo's career this one will be nothing more than a footnote. When they look at it from Charlo's point of view all it will be is a lesson in hubris. Aside from that it will be forgotten quickly enough and rarely re-watched.

 

Fake News???

Don't make me embarrass your mental ill aze and call out other posters who you have debated with over your stance that the EARTH IS FLAT

 

I've debated that topic like I've debated many topics. I am very open to the idea that the earth is flat, and I've definitely challenged globe believers and space nerds on their beliefs. But that doesn't mean I think or have concluded that the earth is flat. I've found many flat earth arguments interesting and it's definitely made me question if the earth is a globe, but that's the extent of it. It's never got to the point of no return. It's something that there's always gonna be debate over.

 

First it was FAKE NEWS
You need professional help and I’m not even joking

 

Sad
Sad
Sad
So you just debate others taking the stance that the earth is FLAT for fun? Weirdo

 

Charlo-Lubin II

 

Charlo made weight and agreed to fight a superior boxer. His fight plan had zero chance but he had no real chance of beating Canelo. Charlo is big enough to fight at 168 but he can only win if he has a size advantage so it’s back to the lower weights. He knew it the second he stepped into the ring. Charlo is a B- or C+ fighter. He got a payday but was only chosen because Canelo knew it would be easy money and it was.

 

Shows his mental state. It was not some casual talk either . Several threads and the amount of crap the idiot was typing. Only someone who is warped in the head would spend that much time and energy on it.

Hell it wasnt even a debate. People on thread was laughing.

 

Flat Earth has become a very big topic over the years. It was very entertaining and informative to challenge globsters on their beliefs and give them the opportunity to debunk flat earth arguments. Suffice to stay, they didn't do a very good job of that. Instaed of getting intelligent responses, it was more "noooooo it's a globe, ahhhhh you're a flat earther" kinda responses.