Can Mayweather and Pacquiao crack a top ten ATG LWW list?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, May 28, 2020.


Can Mayweather and Pacquiao crack a top ten ATG LWW list

  1. Both can

    3 vote(s)
    27.3%
  2. Neither can

    4 vote(s)
    36.4%
  3. Just Mayweather

    2 vote(s)
    18.2%
  4. Just Pacquiao

    2 vote(s)
    18.2%
  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,861
    Sep 15, 2009
    I find this an interesting concept.

    Both men achieved great things beneath LWW and above LWW whilst only really dipping their toes in LWW waters.

    That being said both dipped their toes with devastating effect. Mayweather overcame a scare to beat Corley and then dominated Gatti before moving on. Pacquiao anhilated the divisional number 1 in Ricky Hatton.

    So both very thin resumes, both hinted as to how dominant they can be at LWW, both beat great fighters beneath 140 and above 140.

    So what say you?

    Can both or either of them crack a top ten ATG LWW list?
     
    Rumsfeld and George Crowcroft like this.
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    Tough one, since it mainly depends on criteria.

    Achievements? Nah, not imo. Hatton was over the hill, and not high enough caliber opponent anyway, and Gatti just wasn't all that good.

    H2H, though? Abso-mutha****in'-lutely. I think both Pac and PBF are at their best between 130 and 140. Looking at some make shift top 10s at 140, I'd pick Pac and Floyd to beat most of them.

    In fact, I may actually lean towards Pacquiao being better than Floyd H2H here. I'd pick him to destroy Pryor and Ortiz, KO Benítez, beat Chavez (barely) and Ross. I'm happy to explain why BTW.

    Whereas I think think Ross would give Mayweather DLH-esc problems, and Chavez would out-do Castillo. Benítez would give him major problems, Ortiz too. Pryor is God awful for Mayweather, but I think his counters and defence would nick a really close decision. Could go either way, that one.

    But then again I'd always pick Floyd over Pac, and I'd pick Floyd over Napoles and Marquez (obviously) who both get the better of Pacquiao imo. Ike Williams too.

    So in short, they're H2H beats, but it's all speculation.
     
    young griffo, Jel, Rumsfeld and 2 others like this.
  3. WAR01

    WAR01 In the 7.2% Full Member

    1,776
    1,540
    Aug 19, 2019
    Pac beat an ATG? George you will be hung for that you fool, everyone knows Pac loses to every ATG just cause please tell me you are drunk.

    Would like to here your reasons though... especially concerning Pryor
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,861
    Sep 15, 2009
    I agree with a lot of this. But I'm not sure I see Pac beating Chavez and I don't think Ross could impose his jab the way Oscar did, in fact, Oscar De La HOY a definitely deserves a mention in this conversation as well.

    The way past prime Oscar ran Floyd close, tells me a peak Oscar could pound out a decision.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  5. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    Well, Pryor is very overrated in my opinion. So that's a good place to start before I say why I think Pac beats him so quickly.

    Pryor was often all over the place, and didn't have the best defence. He'd bumrush guys from the get-go, and was often walked onto shots. Pacquiao, a very crafter puncher, underrated on the back-foot, would pick a straight left early which sets him off and he jumps all over him in a Hatton-esc way. Pryor, being much better than Hatton, fights back in one of the fiercest wars ever, but is stopped a little later. He can't take that power and speed for too long. Pac KO4.

    Basically Pacquiao drastically outguns him, physically, in a barnburner.
     
    wutang likes this.
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,661
    17,718
    Apr 3, 2012
    Off the top of my head:
    Benitez
    Zoo
    Hatton
    Chavez
    Bradley
    Cervantes
    Cotto
    Judah
    Taylor...

    Nothing wrong with Pac and Floyd rounding out the top 10.
     
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Mayweather can. Pac didn't do enough.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,861
    Sep 15, 2009
    So Corley and Gatti is enough, even though Zoo was the reigning champ.

    But Hatton isn't enough even though Hatton wad the reigning champ?
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,861
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's a tricky top ten to compile as they used to have a championship many years before it became more renowned. Canzoneri Ross and Berg were all ATG level fighters.

    But since its reinvigoration Ortiz, Loi, Hernandez, Locche, Cervantes, Benitz, Pryor, Chavez, Hoya, Zoo, Hatton, Garcia, Crawford were all great champions in the division.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,861
    Sep 15, 2009
    I agree with this somewhat.

    If Hatton and Cotto were both unable to enforce their will on Pacquiao, I don't think many in history would at this class.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Hatton to me is a little overrated. And Hatton beat him on his 2nd to last fight.

    Who's Corley, do you mean Diego Corrales? Corrales was a very good fighter with wins over Jose Castillio and Joel Casamayor. Mayweather shut him down and knocked him out. While I don't really consider Gatti great, Mayweather badly outclassed him.
     
  12. 88Chris05

    88Chris05 Active Member Full Member

    1,393
    3,223
    Aug 20, 2013
    In ability and head-to-head potential yes, in terms of record and accomplishments no is the long and short of it, really.

    Edit: Should add that this essentially means no as far as I'm concerned, as i think real-life championship consistency and achievements have to trump hypotheticals and raw ability which were never put to the test, especially if you're rating guys from right across history.

    Kind of shows the vagaries and difficulties of the additional weight classes though, even for Light-Welter which I consider the best of them all. Hatton would have had ten bells knocked out of him by Mosley, would have been shut out by Whitaker and been mauled and outclassed by Duran....But by the letter of the law he goes down as a better 140 pounder than all of them.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,432
    21,861
    Sep 15, 2009
    Fact check and then come back to me.
     
    wutang likes this.
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,661
    17,718
    Apr 3, 2012
    I forgot Crawford, Pryor and Ortiz. Pac and May probably shouldn’t be in there off resume then.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Nowhere near.

    My top 10 comprises the likes of Chavez, Ross, Tszyu, Loi, Locche, Ortiz, Perkins, Cervantes, Benitez, Crawford, Berg, Pryor. That's 11, some of which have stronger claims to the tenth spot than others. I wouldn't put Mayweather or Pacquiao top 15 or top 20, in fact, Floyd's 140lb run was the worst part of his career.

    H2H is a different question entirely.