can Mikkel Kessler have a better legacy then calzaghe when he retires

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by stephen, May 28, 2009.


  1. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Calzaghe beats a 'prime' Kessler and goes on to retire unbeaten after many years as a belt holder, yet you think that Calzaghe can be 'easily overtaken' by Kessler, you are guilty of not accepting one boxer is better than another, you reward failure, its not surprising really as you are a FAILURE and a LOSER yourself.
     
  2. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    calm down...thats a pretty tame post you are quoting...he just said kess would lose to hopkins...
     
  3. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008

    :huh:huh

    :rofl:rofl
     
  4. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    CALZAGHE BEATS KESSLER [FACT]
    CALZAGHE BEATS HOPKINS [FACT]
    HOPKINS WOULD COMPREHENSIVELY BEAT KESSLER SAYS 'DINAMITA'.

    YET ACCORDING TO THAT BIASED FOOL OF A POSTER 'DINAMITA', KESSLER CAN EASILY OVERTAKE CALZAGHE IN THE LEGACY STAKES. :nut

    League Table
    Calzaghe played 2 won 2
    Hopkins played 2 won 1
    Kessler played 2 lost 2

    Some people love to reward 'losers' on this site.
     
  5. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009
    **** wad, P4P rankings from a magazine do not have to mean ****. Neither Hop nor Calzaghe deserve to be in any P4P ranking. They have both been picking and choosing opponents (rightfully so in BHOP's case because he is far past prime .. i.e., he is OLD) for several years now.

    Neither placed any stamp on the LHW division. BHOP is an ATG and a legend. Joe is/was a pretty good fighter (non-elite). But, don't buy into the hype like a novice.

    Get a brain ya ****ing idiot.
     
  6. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    Ive been a critic of Kessler on here....and rightly so...

    but ill say one thing....

    Calzaghe in no way would have faced a rival supermiddle in their backyard..(in their prime)

    Kessler is a bit of a con artist but he showed balls taking that fight...doubt Joe would have dont that.
     
  7. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Definitely but he needs to get his act together and step outta Denmark a little !!
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :lol: As usual, you fail to comprehend the importance of resume.

    Kessler has already beaten: Andrade, Beyer, Lucas, Mundine

    Say he then beats: Froch, Bute, Abraham, Pavlik, Dawson, G.Johnson, Erdei.

    Then obviously he would have a better legacy than ol' Shoddy Res Joe, despite how many times Joe had defended the WBO smw title at the Cardiff Ice Rink.

    He would have cleaned out two divisions. Now this may not happen, but it is possible so therefore yes it is possible that Kessler could have a better legacy than Joe by the time he retires, so the answer to the question asked is yes, so that's what I said.

    Do you understand now, you simpleton?
     
  9. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    No

    but he can diminish Calzaghe's legacy by losing a lot of fights
     
  10. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    If he beats Froch, Bute and Pavlik then he will.