Maybe he is, maybe he is not. We'll see when they fight. Meanwhile, let's not make any excuses as to why a fighter might lose. If Pac beats Mayweather, he is simply a better fighter and I am perfectly comfortable with that.
its not maybe its a fact his resume and record proves it....... Floyd for once will be in a tough fight:hi:
Pacquiao has been beating the hell out of bigger guys for years. If you think Mayweather is too good, that's different. But don't bring up size here. They are both fighting at the same weight class and if you think Floyd is going to get close enough to bully Pac, you're a boxing novice.
Again none of these guys were PBF. Mosley shot Margo never good to begin with and a disgraced cheat Cotto not much taller and his reach is the same as Pac's Clottey garbage fight didn't show up to win. Algieri is a nobody Oscar shot drained and never fought again. JMM same length of arms and same height went life and death with him for 4 fights and got put into a coma by him.
so Bradley schools jmm and jmm knocks out pac so ofcourse Bradley would beat pac right? triangle theories don't work and there are many many proofs for this you ****ing idiot
Who said anything about a loss, numbskull? lol All of their fights were very competitive and that is what I am basing my statement on.
lol Then that excludes you and what triangle theory are you talking about? I am just talking about Marquez and Pac, where is the third point of the triangle?
Pac doesn't throw a looping overhand right which is a punch that PBF has trouble dealing with. Not only that it was Maidana's strength and dirtiness on the inside that gave him some problems. Pac doesn't fight like that and he's a clean fighter.
And JMM a man PBF shut out put your God in a coma.:deal On top of that JMM said PBF would beat Pac and you did to.:hi:
pac would get beat by al remi khan would stop golovkin :nut Dummy my mind games have worked on you dumb ass *****s