Can Pavlik win a fight against a pure boxer?

He didn't do bad against Taylor. I guess he can if the guy is not too fast, too slick and doesn't punch hard.

 

Yea, Pavlik did it twice agianst Taylor.

 

You underrate Taylor's power.

 

i know most of u think im crazy but i firmly believe as long as sturm doesnt get stupid and try to trade with pavlik he should be able to box circles around him for a decision victory. :bbb:thumbsup

 

If they had a weak chin, yeah for sure.

Taylor is not a pure boxer.

 

In Germany?

 

pavlik can definitely beat a pure boxer. the guys a ****in beast. once he gains a fighters respect with his workrate and power, it doesn't matter what kind of fighter he is. he's gonna stop taking chances, go on the defensive, and will eventually either tire and get knocked out, or tire and lose the fight on points. obviously it depends on who we're talking about here. hopkins was obviously bigger than pavlik and is an atg. who else is gonna beat pav? i dont think anyone, especially at 160. pavlik is much better suited at 160, not 168.

 

Sturm can box, he gave delahoya a good fight and many thought he won that fight. This guy can fight and i would not be surprise if he beat pavilk. I hope the middleweight champions can fight each other and try to unify the titles.

Have a middleweight tournament like don king did back in early 2000's.

 

Matt Korobov perhaps down the road but right now I'd have to agree with you.

 

i still havent seen much of korobov. i better start looking up some stuff cause i'm hearing a lot lately.

 

Sturm is a more skilled "pure boxer" than Pavlik or Abraham. However, 12 rounds is a long ****ing time when you're trying to keep a relentless KP from trapping you on ropes, or trying to keep AA from landing a bomb. I think he loses to both.

 

Yes, he did it against Taylor.

 

Taylor is not a pure boxer.