Can People Seriously Get The 'P4P' Meaning Right!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lazarus, Apr 7, 2010.


  1. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Holy ****, so many of you have no ****ing clue what P4P is in regards to.

    It has nothing to do with weight class limits or restrictions. It has to do with the talent of the boxer compared to other fighters regardless of their weights.

    Here is the best example:

    Yuriorkis Gamboa is the best featherweight.
    Wlad Klitschko is the best heavyweight.
    P4P Yuriorkis Gamboa is more talented than the best heavyweight, so he ranks higher on a P4P scale, but clearly he couldn't go to HW and beat Wlad.

    If Wlad was more talented as a HW than Gamboa as a FW, then Wlad would rank higher P4P.

    It's completely skill/talent based.
     
  2. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Because I thought 'P4P' was the meaning of domination and winning titles in multiple weight classes, not just 2. But my overall opinion on 'P4P' has changed. Learned a lot in these past posts :good
     
  3. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Most fighters skillsets are based on their physical attributes. Some to do with their size. Some to do with their speed. Some to do with their stamina or endurance or punch resistance. No reason you can't judge all of them in the same way.
     
  4. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    How many people would actually qualify for P4P if that was the criteria? :lol: Mayweather, Pacquaio, Jones.....ermmmm?
     
  5. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    But weight is supposed to be removed as a factor when discussing P4P, that's the whole point of P4P - it's not the same as speed at all.
     
  6. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    1 person or 100. Doesn't matter. That's how I personally thought 'P4P' should be.
     
  7. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    Totally wrong p4p was created to give fighters below heavyweight credit. Most traditionalists never list a heavyweight on their list.
     
  8. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    You were talking about height mainly, not weight. Out of Vitali's last eight opponents, the only one he substantially outweighed was Gomez.
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,171
    Jun 23, 2005
    I always thought it meant regardless of weightclass which fighter is cleary the best.
     
  10. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Agree
     
  11. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    What about Wlad?

    Gomez was the only one with any skills as well, but was completely out of his depth in terms of size.

    I can't repeat it enough - size is supposed to be a non factor in P4P, which is why you can't judge HW's against guys that have to make weight. Wlad and Vitali couldn't fight the way they do currently in the mythical world of P4P, so how can you accurately judge their skills?
     
  12. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Here are some others.

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=72645
     
  13. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    p4p is too a penny theese days :deal

    someone wins a round and there next p4p :roll:
     
  14. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Weight is supposed to be a non-factor, so you may need to take that more into account when dealing with heavyweights. Height helps define how a fighter fights.
     
  15. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,662
    Jul 26, 2004
    :good