Can Ray Leonard be Rated Above Duran All Time P4P?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PowerPuncher, Oct 8, 2008.


  1. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,581
    Dec 18, 2004

    I wasn't really referring to the 'above weight' limit mate just the fact that his lost but in a non-title fight, therefore his actual reign is stronger than Leonard's. That's not to say it's not a great win for De Jesus- it is, and a very convincing one at that. If Duran was champ for three years then it'd be equal, but 7 is a decent tenure and he deserves to be rated higher at 135 than Ray does at 147.
     
  2. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    84
    Aug 26, 2004
    Kalule was a better fighter than anyone Duran beat at lightweight incidentally.
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    In response to the thread title- yes. P4p that is, if that term/concept is taken as who was better p4p, this can be seen as the better man regardless of weight at their best, or overall based on performances, all things considered, the case can be made for either man. Though the thread title does say all-time which lessens Leonard's chances here in my own humble opinion, that refers more to a legacy/greatness aspect in a viewpoint which can be justified. That is where i always take Duran, as the GREATER fighter, though i suppose the case can be made for Leonard, for me its always Duran in that repsect though.
     
  4. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    Sweet Pea gets my vote for most improved poster whose senses rival my own
     
  5. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    :bolt
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,853
    10,059
    Jul 15, 2008
    Yes. It is a tough call but it is not an unreasonable thought
     
  7. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Why do you insult poor little Sweet Pea :?
     
  8. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,581
    Dec 18, 2004

    No he wasn't. All his best wins came against Has-Beens or inexperienced fighters.
     
  9. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Okay so you weren't making an attempt to look at this other than to promote Leonard... That's why you picked 5? 8? 10? 20? It's all arbitrary... Even so look at how past it Duran was. Look at how he was written off when he fought Cuevas, Barkley, Moore

    2. Leonard lost to a guy whose best days were at 135. That tells you an awful lot abotu where they should be in a p4p sense.

    I think the rest of what you say is based on numbers which just about sums it up... Your roll the dice theory puts boxing on a par with roulette and if you follow it through actually makes it preferable for a fighter to not have fought.

    Like I said I appreciate your sentiment...none fo the fab 4 are that much better than the others...but it still clear who the number 1 is.