Can someone please make sense of this Khan bs for me?

ho shut the fk up

 

What did Guerrero or Ortiz ever do to deserve the fight ?

 

guerrero beat berto, al haymons protege

 

No need to avenge losses all the time or Chino would need to avenge his Kotelnik, Khan and Alexander defeats.

 

My point was this and I think others who prefer Kahn feel the same.

It's not the he deserves it, but his style offers something different than every guys Floyd has fought the past half a dozen years. Come forward fighters, that never never really stood a chance, of course there are exceptions to that but for the most part that is all floyd has fought. I simply wanted to see a fast techinical boxers who will not just stand there get in there and see how floyd approaches it and if any weaknesses could be shown in mayweather a game to this kind of fighter.

That said what the hell has maidana done to deserve this fight? Beat broner? Lol

 

I agree w this thread

 

What is a Smibbly Bibbly?

 

You can pipe down with your feigned indignation, he didnt get the fight, he got treated like **** that cost him valuable time. Why are you monkeys still complaiing?

Oh, and I love this 'he barely beat Maidana' well he beat him,maidana couldnt even barely beat khan, he lost. UD. wasnt even close.

 

Neither man deserves the fight and Floyd should receive the usual backlash(which he obviously doesn't care about) for his lack of ambition in terms of opponent. However, of the two, Maidana has looked far better than Khan over the past two years, and has a few solid wins at Welterweight, including the mild upset win over Broner.

 

Floyd is always looking for marketable stiffs to fight. Why the surprise?

 

Khan is fast but not technical. His actual technical skills are lacking for a world-class fighter.

Mayweather against either Khan or Maidana is a dreadful mismatch, so I didn't really care either way whom he chose.

 

Explain this mayweather bull*****