Can someone please make sense of this Khan bs for me?

Any fighter coming off a major unexpected victory, regardless of sport, is going to be rated highly and overrated by fans in general. That's how stars are rated, you earn a major victory and you will get what you deserve by the media and general public. This isn't rocket science.

Yes we can agree that Bradley most definitely deserves a major fight, guess why?, because he also earned it by shocking the public in the general(kind of reminds you of Maidana's situation, right?). Surely you will also agree that Bradley is with TOP RANK(Feel free to look up Arum's conflict with Mayweather) and is scheduled to rematch Pacquiao in April, yes?. Bradley also extended his contract with TOP RANK, which is why he got the rematch with Pacquiao anyway.

As far as Khan is concerned, he will only deserve a major fight when he proves he's worth it in the ring. Twitter exchanges and victories may mean a lot to you but to proper fans it means jack****.

 

Please stop posing like I'd be lobbying for Khan to get a Mayweather-shot or am some kind of fanboy of his just bc I think that he would be a better choice than Maidana. I think I made my point clear.

And no, I don't see the parallel between Bradley and Maidana, Bradley beat 2 HOF-fighters and one of the hottest prospects of the division back to back to back and he had a damn good resume even before that.
Maidana beat two proven hypejobs that will never do anything in the sport, in between that he got beat by the unworthy Khan and shut out by the mighty Devon Alexander, a guy Bradley dominated with ease by the way.

Stop telling people Maidana is deserving of a shot at Mayweather, he is a bum who got lucky that he got his hands on Broner first.
Maidana is, was, and will always be a B-level fighter at best, that every above average boxer should be able to beat comfortably, see Alexander.
He couldn't knock glass jaw Khan out, almost got blown out in one by nutcase Ortiz etc etc etc

Maidana is a gatekeeper and the fact that we found out that Broner isn't the next big thing but just an overrated hypejob doesn't change that.

Mayweather shouldn't be fighting gatekeepers, Mayweather should be aiming to fight the best, no matter who promotes them. That whole "I don't do business with Bob Arum" is a childish excuse for ducking the two best welterweights out there and nothing else.

 

Again you repeat the same crap over and over which unfortunately means nothing at this point especially when you consider Maidana a "bum". Yeah, now everyone expected him to beat Broner but before the fight everyone thought he's getting easily outclassed. You can give him zero credit all you like, sadly your credit means absolutely nothing especially when only a few posts above you openly said you prefer Khan(who's inactive for one year and coming off a life and death experience against Diaz) over him. Your opinion here is completely invalid and is full of nothing but pure blind hate, which sadly makes you irrelevant altogether.

You're seriously showing signs of severe brain damage or confirming yourself as yet another e-troll desperate for e-attention. You say he should fight Bradley or Pacquiao despite knowing, I hope, that both are already scheduled to fight. Not to forget that both are with TOP RANK and surely you must know Mayweather's problems with Arum. If Mayweather refused to negotiate for a Pacquiao fight, which would have made multi-millions and easily broke PPV records, then why in the hell do you think he will negotiate a fight with Bradley?. Use your head and browse Google for information, I'm not here to educate you.

 

Haha, okay dude, stop it right there.
I repeat the same lines over and over bc you don't seem to be able to mentally grasp the essence of what I'm saying.

Maidana doesn't deserve the fight with Floyd, bc if what Maidana has done is enough to land a shot at Floyd, Collazo would qualify also, same with Porter who easily beat the guy Maidana couldn't manage to win a single round against by the way. Do they seem like worthy challengers to you at this time? No. Because all they have is that one signature victory over questionable/limited opposition. That's what Floyd has always done, pick guys coming of overrated performances at the peak of their hype. Young hungry lion Ortiz? That human quit-job that was the best scalp on Maidanas resume before Boner? Remember him? Collazo and Lopez destroyed the guy in much more impressive manner than Maidana, who almost got knocked out in 1. Do you hear guys trying to justify them as credible opposition for Mayweather? No, of course not.

I like Maidana and his style, but vs a defensive minded world class fighter he just simply doesn't stand a chance in hell, I saw Alexander shutting him out, I don't need to see Floyd do the same to him...It will be unwatchable and boring, with Khan at least we might see Floyd knocking somebody out and all around being forced to fight a different style, which would be more entertaining to watch than the foregone coclusion a Maidana-fight is.

That doesn't mean that I'm trying to justify Khan as a credible opponent, he's not. But he makes for a better fight than Maidana.
You said Khan doesn't deserve it, I told you why Maidana doesn't deserve it either, that doesn't have anything to do with hate.
I couldn't be more indifferent when it comes to Maidana, Khan or any of those other no hoper b-level-fighters Floyd includes on his bum-carousel-tour actually...

Now I get it, you are a Maidanalphabet and a fanboy, but please just try to accept the fact that other people would rather see the guy who kicked Maidanas ass in there with Floyd.

Maidana isn't even the best argentine welterweight, Matthysse would murder him...

So if its Khan or Maidana I prefer Khan bc he actually brings sth to the table we haven't seen 1000 times before, speed and workrate. I don't need to see another overrated bum chasing for the hail mary for 12 rounds, we had that.

If Floyd had any balls at all he would push for Pacquiao and Bradley, he is in a position to get any fights done he wants to make, but he chooses to hide behind childish excuses like "I'm not doing business with Arum" and thats why he deserves to get all that **** about his selection of opponents, period.

The part with the brain damage...Ever heard of the psychological phenomenon "projection"?

I'm outta here dude, doesn't make any sense arguing with you...

 

Did you seriously compare Maidana beating Broner to Collazo beating Ortiz? . You know a lot about sense alright. I didn't even bother reading the rest of this junk, that Collazo statement was good enough to end it.

 

Yes I compare Collazo beating hypejob Ortiz (a man 2 fights ago regarded legit enough to share the ring with the p4p-king by yourself I assume) to Maidana beating hypejob Broner.

I see Collazo and Maidana on the same level actually, decent contenders but nowhere elite and sure as hell nowhere deserving a Mayweather-showdown.

By the way, your comparison of Bradleys back to back victories over ATG-calliber fighters mixed in with beating one of the hottest prospects in the weight-class to Maidana exposing a lightweight-hypejob and beating a couple of gatekeepers and bums is more out of this world than anything I could ever produce...

And now please stop acting like beating Broner is something special and worthy of a Mayweather-fight.
Do you really think Collazo couldn't have done the same?
I wonder when Ponce de Leon and Malignaggi get their shots at Floyd for beating up Broner :-(

 

berto is rubbish ? since when does beating berto qualify you for a floyd fight then

 

Khan has a better chance at winning more rounds (like maybe 2) but Maidana has a better chance at winning. Which is like 1%

Maidana's chances of landing a hail mary bomb is better than Khan's chances of doing something worth a damn after the 3rd round.

 

to me, Khan talked his way out of a fight with Mayweather this year. To just straight up beg Floyd for the fight was pathetic. For me there is absolutely nothing Khan can do this year to get the September fight with Mayweather.