Wow. This is a horribly dumb thing to say. Duran/Leonard I feels like... Duran/Leonard I. We always knew what that felt like because, well, it was what it was. Just like how Mayweather/Pacquiao felt like Mayweather/Pacquiao, like how Rigondeaux/Donaire felt like Rigondeaux/Donaire, and like how Golovkin/Jacobs felt like Golovkin/Jacobs.
I'm talking about for yaaaa,Duran Woped Leonard and Leonard's fans hated Duran and said he lost,GGG beat Jacobs CLEANLY And His Fans Saying GGG lost,Donaire rigo was a wipeout,pacman Floyd was controversial, nothing like this
Not sure if being selective in what you are hearing and reading or if you're just trolling... can't tell which.
That several well respected posters on here, and several well known Golovkin fanboys on here, have echoed the sentiment which you seem so defensive of. Many that scored it for Golovkin acknowledge the close nature and controversy of such a close, debatable fight. Capitalizing "CLEANLY" doesn't change that, even if it helped you sleep last night.
It's deader than a doornob. Compared to boxing that rolling around on the ground crap is just plain dull. As soon as those bogus "fights" hit the ground, it's time to go to sleep.
If you're saying GGG vs Jacobs killed MMA then you're a ******... There's a lot more than just boxing in MMA. It may surprise you but some people actually like watching the grappling, the mix up between stand up, fighting against the cage, ground fighting, leg kicks, elbows etc. If you like just boxing then that's great but it's like saying a really good ping pong game just killed tennis as a sport - dumb as **** (like you).
Boxing's success or failure has next to nothing to do with the state of UFC/MMA and vice versa. Different sports with largely different fanbases.
