Can We Get A Handle On Jeffries From This Footage?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Dec 23, 2013.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,739
    29,091
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't think Jeffries looks worse than many of the heavyweight challengers the Klits have beaten , the big question is ,does he look any better?

    I just dont see the fleet footwork, or good defence in his movements and stylistic posture, that is described in reports of his fights.
    His hook does seem heavy and delivered with," bad intentions ".

    I suspect it is relative, that compared to those who had gone before [Corbett being an exception,] Jeffries being comparatively huge, writers were surprised by his mobility.

    As far as boxing in general is concerned.
    I think it peaked in the 20's and 30's.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    We are looking at a 100+ year old grainy film that runs slow. Still you can pick up on a few things. Jeffries looks like a tank, but he was also a patient fighter.

    In this case Jeffries had already hurt Ruhlin. He is is stalking mode, and shows he has pretty good footwork, a head and body attack, and the concept of cutting off the ring.

    None of the old timers pre 1920 will have a modern look and feel of a pound for pound fighter, even Joe Gans. However we are talking about heavyweight here.

    Jeffries certainly had durability, power, and stamina in the spades which are paramount at heavyweight. As such, he could over come lack of technique. Had Jeffries been born in modern times, he would adapt to the techniques of the times like a fish to water as he was a very good athlete. Jeffries full work out ( More than is shown on you tube ) verifies that he was in fact agile, limber, and skilled.

    Stopping Ruhlin in 5 rounds, 1 round before Fitzsimmons is impressive. This film takes place in 1901. Jeffries improved his technique as the years rolled on.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    All measurable sports have vastly improved including those like running and swimming that were around since the dawn of time. Even technique has improved for something as basic as running so boxing

    Jeffries wasn't the most skilled of his time by any means though, he's almost a more primitive version of George Foreman or Max Baer, both being much improved

    But as Frazier and others have said without these forerunners we wouldn't have developed the level that boxing is at today. They were all building the foundations of the sport.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,739
    29,091
    Jun 2, 2006
    The film shows Ruhlin to be quicker afoot.
    There is not enough pre -1920 footage available to make the statement that," none of them will have a modern look or feel of a modern
    fighter ".with any certainty.
    Jeffries had durability and a hefty wallop, how much stamina he had compared to his contempories is open to question. He never went past 25 rds and then did that only once ,and he was fighting a man over 30lbs lighter and 6 inches shorter. That man was doing all the forcing ,so if Jeffries had exceptional stamina , what does that say about those that went the distance with him?

    Choynski 20 rds conceding anything up to 67lbs. Corbett went into the 23rd and he was in his 30's and coming out of an extended retirement.Sharkey went 20 & 25rds with him giving up a lump of weight and 6 inches in height. I don't see that his stamina was any better than others of his times.

    Johnson for example went into the 26th rd with a giant when he was 37 years old ,and for the first 20 rds was in front.
    Sullivan chased Corbett when totally washed up gradually slowing to a walk and being stopped in the21st rd ,and both Johnson and Sullivan were "making the fight".

    Stopping a softened up Ruhlin ,[whom Fitz had half killed],one round earlier means nothing.

    Do you want to compare Fitz's results against Sharkey with those of Jeffries?
    There are two pieces of film that show Jeffries in actual combat , in neither of which does he demonstrate this agility ,limber body, or skills.

    Jeffries was bang in his prime at 26 when he fought Ruhliin in 1901, he only had 3 more fights before retiring. one was against a no hoper , the others were against faded ex champs who were coming out of several years of retirement.One would expect Jeffries to look good against them, but in fact against one, the near 40 years old Fitz he got his head punched in before Fitz's always suspect hands went on him.
     
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    old film is tough but he looks strong, quick execution, strong and aggressive, you can see how shot he was if you compare the Johnson film. Jeffries was one of the best of the time and did what he had to do with the tools & knowledge of his day...He looks like a force to be reckoned with
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,431
    9,419
    Jul 15, 2008

    I'd agree with that .. to me he falls into the category of fight that could have been trained and excelled in modern day ...
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,739
    29,091
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'd certainly pick him to beat Arreola,Wach,Solis, etc and that's as he was.
     
  8. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,282
    1,090
    Sep 10, 2005
    I suppose it is good the fact you noted Jeffries was looking to counter against Sharkey. He was accused in that fight of easing up on the smaller man and didn't show enough killer instinct. Jeffries was a steady fighter. He certainly didn't fight as he looked, and that makes for something of a curiosity.

    The impression I get is that Jeffries was quite basic in terms in what he did but executed everything with care, maintained good concentration levels for more than 20 rounds and was terribly strong throughout.

    The training footage of Jeffries for Ruhlin does show him on his toes and looking rather nimble with weights in his hands.
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,431
    9,419
    Jul 15, 2008
    I don't think Max Baer looks any bester or even close .. I could see this Jeffries pounding out Baer ..
     
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,431
    9,419
    Jul 15, 2008
    I agree .. he was clearly an intelligent, methodical fighter ... he had said that he paced himself because of the scheduled duration of his bouts ..
     
  11. DaveK

    DaveK Vicious & Malicious Full Member

    3,668
    35
    Mar 2, 2009
    No disrespect, but the guy in the film is so open to right hands, its embarrassing. Especially against a right hand puncher like Baer, who will be throwing it hard and often.

    Perhaps Jeffries' posture changes if he has a guy in front of him who is scared and backpedaling, offering zero offense, but it looks like Jeff is looking for one big hook, which you can see coming a mile away.

    How is he going to deal with someone who has the size and confidence in their right to keep tossing it?

    It seems to me Baer would have a any hand festival on this guys head for as long as it took.
     
  12. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Well, basically we see Jeffries fighting in a unhurried but fairly steady pace. When Ruhlin is willing to meet him Jeffries is mainly focused on hitting Ruhlin back. Jeffries drops Ruhlin with a body blow. In the later stages of the round Ruhlin tries a bit to stay away, but Jeffries is generally able to close the distance and throw a punch in once he sees Ruhlin is no longer going to give him anything to counter. Jeffries isn't looking to do much infighting. I'll check apollacks 'In the Ring .... Jeffries' to see whether punching in the clinches was allowed in this fight.
    The only thing I'd really fault Jeffries on was that he could have angled his motions a bit more to keep Ruhlin cornered. I don't think Jeffries felt any sense of urgency. It was a twenty rounder, there were fifteen rounds left, Ruhlin was going, he wasn't going to shake off his body beating, and there wasn't much on the punches coming Jeffries way (probably due to a combination of attrition and discouragement). Jeffries was content to steadily wear down Ruhlin, no drama, like a starfish wearing out a clam. It was enough to get Billy Madden (Ruhlin's corner) to stop the fight after the round was over.
    In Ruhlin's defense: 1) Madden said Ruhlin wanted to keep going; 2) Madden had seen Fitzsimmons beat the holy hell out of Ruhlin -- for several hours after the Fitz fight Ruhlin's people were seriously concerned he was going to die -- and didn't want to see a repeat.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,739
    29,091
    Jun 2, 2006
    Baer doesn't look as tight as Jeffries, my problem is Jeffries looks very open to a right hand,and one delivered from 6' 2.5" with Baer's undoubted power behind it would definitely not be good news .
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,739
    29,091
    Jun 2, 2006
    Ruhlin was throwing little at Jeffries which may be why we see no head movement from Jeff. If there was "incoming", he might have been more evasive.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,739
    29,091
    Jun 2, 2006

    Training footage of Johnson skipping around with dumbells in his hands shows a light on his feet dancer , but he did not fight like that and neither did Jeffries,as we have both noted.