same can be said about Marquez VS PAC 2 115-112 JMM 115-112 PAC 114-113 PAC One point Difference... JMM PAC 1 DRAW JMM PAC 2 Pac SD wins by one point... and *******s claim that JMM was dominated LMAO... Pac has nightmares and its JMM always says that JMM was his toughest opponnent
Barrera v Morales I is probably...no, it is my favourite bout to watch out of any bout I have seen to this point. Morales v Pacquiao is a very good watch though.
just been busy working dude I have not been on in months, thanks for asking buddy just continuing to watch Paquiao swiftly kick ass as usual and continuing to be thoroughly amazed by your country man Boom.....WOW decided to post tonight, nothing changes around here though, same none sense...lol....how many screen names does Nagelle have now??.....lol
Definitely, and if you include JMM...like someone mentioned in the thread earlier, it's kind of a Fab Four. All warriors, all dig deep and produce the goods when needed...win or lose.
Yeah, just read that. Sorta where my brain was going.... but I couldn't put Morales vs Marquez in, so it's got a little bit of a disconnect.
prime Morales was tight though a Classic Boxing Style ala Tommy Hearns or Lennox Lewis or some **** just pugilist specialist...lol
Still wouldn't mind seeing that bout even now. A couple months back I was saying JMM v Pacquiao at a catchweight would be good, but I feel Pacquiao has shown too much at the higher weights now. But Marquez v Morales (no matter what happens in the Katsidis bout), possibly both their retirement bouts...
Funny that the only relevant thing about these two wins are size. That's all people ever say, and it's all they are. Cherry picked? By 95% of definitions defined by people on this site, 100% abso-****ing-lutely, and then some...