Canelo Alvarez is NOT beating Austin Trout

You and those "official scores" again. I can't hate on you though, at least you're consistent.

 

i'm sure he agreed with the Pac-Marquez III cards too :roll:

 

Anybody who had Trout 9-3 cant be taken serious, anybody who gave the 7th round a 10-9 score cant either

 

Lol, forgot about that one.

 

I fall into neither of those categories, but a one to two point swing or draw in either favor is fair.

 

You can make a stronger case for Marquez in that fight than you can for Trout in this fight deal with it

 

No its not, a 2 point swing for Trout while Trout was knocked down? No way
Clean effective shots who had them? sure as **** wasnt Trout...

 

dude, you're one of the few idiots who actually believe Bradley beat Pac, and you don't even be trolling..

can you make a stronger case for him than Trout?

 

But he outlanded Canelo. Stop with the close minded bull**** zooka.

 

canelo took that. you say in your other post canelo won yet you keep on going. now you're saying trout outlanded him. make your mind up.

 

Yes because unlike Trout, Bradley was making Manny miss most of his shots, Canelo made Trout miss most of his shots:deal

its all about who wins more rounds who lands the cleaner harder shots, and getting knocked down doesnt help your case.

any fan that has the 7th rd 10-9 is a ****ing joke that was a clear 10-8 round

Compu Box is it not subject to errors? do they tell you whos landing the cleaner harder shots?

and according to you guys, Compubox is not a way to make an argument.

 

Castillo doubled Floyd Mayweather in their first fight, did that matter? so your saying May lost that fight to?

 

I'm saying why a win for either guy or draw would've been fair. Is reading comp, not your forte? Whether you value high activity and volume over quality of shots but lower volume. atsch

 

:happy:yep:good

 

a Draw or a W for Trout would not have been right!!! Trout just didnt win that fight man let it ****ing go