are you saying the first fight had 13 rounds? or maybe he saw a 2 point rd for ggg in one of those fights? his creative scoring is out of place in either fight.
Agreed. But I think it reflects the depths of how avoided Golovkin was. There's stories about him offering to fight UK fighters for free in late 00s, and they still wouldn't go near him. He had the reputation as a very low income career-ending fighter. Froch too, openly said back then he wanted no part of Golovkin (until his ego got the better of him).
Well if you could actually read and were not too preoccupied with your agenda, you would realise he was talking about Derevyanchenko - GGG
what agenda, clown. seems the only agenda is coming from some butthurt fanboy who got a rash over one of my posts. i dont even know who in the **** you are.
my country was thrilled with my production, its still thanking me. how bout your contributions, fanboy.
Oh boy, I was merely trying to help you correct a mistake, as you clearly had trouble following the thread and who made what argument. Oh well, have a nice day sir.
I had GGG winning the first fight clearly, Canelo edging the second and if they fight a third time Canelo probably gives him a career ending beating but that's no great achievement. Canelo has been in his prime since he beat Cotto in 2015 and GGG has been slipping since about the same time. Canelo's inability to fight a full three minutes each round is his big weakness and GGG's age will increasingly take away his ability to take advantage of that weakness by pressuring him the entire round, every round.
` FFS Canelo has only fought 2 35+ opponents in the last 5 years and both of them were highly rated and both opponents that "Canelo would never fight" Some of you are simply nit-picky primadonnas. I guess Canelo better not even entertain the thought of fighting Beterbiev.
Had ggg win the first one ..had canelo win the 2nd .... These guys are worse than a soap oprah im so tired of golovkin canelo. Threads .