Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

Nothing more pathetic than you counting blocked Bivol love taps while ignoring effective combos with Bivol on the ropes. You've lost Round 1.

This content is protected

 

I had it 2-2 after 4 and gave Canelo R9.

If I was being generous, I'll give Canelo 1 more round (8-4) but 115-113 is an absolute disgrace as Bivols win was wider than 7-5.

After this and Taylor/Catterall, how many more top top fights are going to be scored dubiously? Add Wilder/Fury #1 to the recent high profile list of misdemeanours.

 

"One" highlight?

 

OK Great. You're much needed in this topic. You had it 2-2 after 4. Which 2 of those rounds did you give Canelo?

 

You're over 40 years old and have an 18-year-old son. This is what you chose to do with your life?

A slowed down clip of an uppercut I'm embarrassed for you.
This might come as a shock to you, but there are 12x 3-minute rounds in a title fight. I know you don't understand the rules and how a fight is scored, but this is a good place to start.

This content is protected

 

Sad little man yelling into the void. Just ask yourself why you saw a close fight when no one else did hahahaha. Maybe your bias is showing?

 

In other words...HELP ME OREET CHA!

This content is protected

 

He has a son? Poor kid with this nut job as his male role model. Hope he has good teachers in school.

 

He claims to have an 18-year-old. To be fair, it could be a teddy bear at this stage.
All the tears over the last week have really started to take their toll on the poor wee fella.

This content is protected

 

The 3 punch combo with Bivol on the ropes was very effective, it's absurd of you to try to discount that. You counted a love tap that was blocked as a landed punch while ignoring that combo. That speaks volumes. Every time I expose you like this, you get all rattled and start going into super duper spin mode.

 

Well he had it 2-2 which you argued was impossible. You said there's no argument that Canelo won round 1 and a 'poor' argument that he won 2 or 3. So yeah, that's another scorer who disagrees with your take on these rounds.