Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

And the jab?

 

This content is protected

 

Oh Oh, against Canelo I already spot a chink in Benavidez's armor. LOL

 

I said I could care less if I'm right or wrong, it's just about studying the footage and discerning what landed. We might not agree on every punch but we should be able to agree on most.

And like that jab, with ellerbe not being sure if it landed, the main thing is that he said he wouldn't be mad that I counted it because it was hard to tell. But you flipped out.

 

Well, well, well... if it isn't ol pal cabron

This thread is still pending your excuses:
[url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/canelo-ggg-needs-to-man-up-about-the-loss.621103/page-8[/url]

This content is protected

 

It barely lands and has no effect whatsover. The language that Shadow uses is if it had mustard on it and Bivol was effected bu it which is claearly coplete and utter nonsense. You cannot count either punch especially not the second that is just demented.
Yet Shadow will ignore shots of Vivol that snaps Canelo's head back because of reasons.

 

What's up putito, always good to talk to big Canelo fans online.

 

But it landed. You wanna say it barely landed, fine, but there's nothing wrong with counting that. It had an effect because it backed Bivol up. He definitely reacted to it. What have I ignored from Bivol that snapped Canelo's head back? Be specific.

 

I wouldn''t score the jab as it has no effect and was more a distration/ range finder to throw the second punch.

 

But would you be mad at me for counting it?

 

Didn't disappear, it's just that I have a life and can't spend too much time online unlike other huge Canelo fans like you and Kiwitito.