Canelo Bivol rounds 1-4 - "close fight" comprehensively debunked debunked

Side note Serge, why didn't ESB filter the word chink in my last post(serious question)?

 

It didn't back him up though. he was leaning back because he knew Canelo was loading up and stepped back making him miss.
Your implying that the jab rocked Bivol back through impact which is clearly nonsense.

 

Can we move on to the next clip?

 

Of course I wouldn't be mad Shadow. you would be wrong but if you want to count that punch then you have to accept that those same punches can count for Bivol as well. It doesn't make it right but you have to be at least consistent and not ignore the other punches because it doesn't suit your narrative.

 

Shadow is tech savvy

 

Or a flat or a round earth....none of us are perfect.

 

Wait don’t tell me he’s an actual flat earther? That would make too much sense.

 

I clowned him on a 60 page Fllat Earth hread. where he threw evetything at it using exactly the same tactics he uses in his demented Canelo threads. fallacies. false equivelence and just making stuff up.

 

No 2 punches are the same. Some punches land better than others. I agree we need to be consistent. In this round most of the punches thrown were either blocked or semi-blocked so it makes it very difficult to decide what should be counted and what shouldn't.

 

This all makes far too much sense now hahahaha

 

I understand that but are you going to be fair? or are you just going to count Canelo's work and ignore Bivol.
Considering the differing punch output that might not suit you and your position.