>>> Canelo, Bumlovkin and the WBA...

Really? Seems more like the WBA have just guaranteed Golovkin a big fight either way. Could fight Jacobs in a mandatory AND defend the WBC (that he'd be upgraded to via the interim) in the same fight.

The WBC have him as the mandatory and given his schedule he'd be able to meet the next mandatory easily. Jacobs in the summer (mandatory and first defense of the WBC), Heiland (WBC mandatory) or BJS (WBO unification for the set) in the fall...viola, thank you Gilberto Mendoza, job here is done!

 

Jacobs is GGG's WBA mandatory there is no rule saying he can't fight for the WBC title in a unification fight

 

And Wade was ranked by the WBA...

He'd be a WBA mandatory [as stated by Mendoza] and it'd be regarded as a WBA/WBC unification bout [hence the lack of a WBC ranking not mattering].

The WBC have shown little to suggest they are forcing mandatories on fighters. Their last mandatory in the weight was in September 2012, they'd almost certainly allow a unification with Heilend Vs TBA for the interim if they were that bothered, and have the Heiland Vs TBA\Golovkin Vs Jacobs winner as the mandatory.

 

Once Canelo is forced to vacate the title, rest will be no problem. Golovkin can go 2 more fights in 2016.

 

Stupid thread...how much it hurts to see a foreigner fightergetting the love that black fighters dont get? It must killing you fool...you must be really really sad re****ed person.:verysad:verysad:verysad

 

As usual, you ducked the rest of his post. Can't WBC just allow Golovkin to fight Jacobs first, make an interim title bout for Heiland and after that order the winners to face each other, like they've been doing for the last year and a half?

 

Yeah, right. They'd have no interest in claiming all three of the IBF/WBC/WBA belts. :nut

 

Please kill yourself.

Thanks.

:good