Here's a critical thinking question which explains the GGG and Canelo/Cotto situation in simpler fashion. There are two groups of people who are running a business. The first group is two kids running a lemonade stand. They go out and buy what the need. Some sugar, which is 2$, a gallon of water, which is 3$, and lemons which costs 5$. So, in total, they spent 10$. The second group is another two kids running a lemonade stand. They go out and buy what the need too; however, they want to make the best lemonade possible so they get the best ingredients they can find. They buy sugar imported from Mexico, which is 10$, 5 bottles of Fiji of water, which is 15$, organic lemons which costs 10$, and a lemon squeezer which cost 25$. So, in total, they spent 50$. The kids in the first lemonade stand set their stand up on a sidewalk. They sold each glass for 75 cents. 15 people stopped by and bought their lemonade. At the end of the day, they counted up all the coins. They saw they made 11.75 dollars. The second group set up their stand outside a conference center during a busy fundraising event. They sold their cups for 85 cents. 25 more people came buy and bought these kids' lemonade compared to the other kids. At the end of the day, they counted their coins and saw they made 34$, 22.25 more dollars than the other stand. Which stand was more successful? The stand who made 11.75$ and spent 10$ for ingredients Or The stand who made 34$ and spent 50$ for ingredients The answer is lemonade stand A, the first one. Though they made less money, they actually walked away richer because they made 1$ more than they spent. The second lemonade stand got 34$ selling their lemonade but they lost 16$ in profit because they couldn't cover the cost of their 50$ ingredients. Same with the two fights. GGG's fight is lemonade stand A, and Cotto/Canelo is lemonade stand B. Though 700,000 buys from Canelo/Cotto may seem like a success on paper- much more than GGG/Lemieux's 150,000- it's actually a failure because they spent more money on the fighters cards (ingredients) than they made from PPV buys (lemonade sold). Hopefully this enlightens some folk.
I don't think it can reach 1 million. Are Cotto and Canelo even that big of draws? I'd think they'd be happy with 500-750k. But maybe I'm underestimating the Mexican audience which historically buys a lot of pay per views and underestimating the Puerto Rican rivalry. I'm not sure why that's a thing. Do Mexicans and Puerto Ricans hate each other? Like did they have a war I don't know about?
I know what abuffy is doing, Shes so transparent its not even funny. Shes hoping this fight does less then 1 million buys that way she could say that the fight was a failure and they lost money, even though it had 900k in ppv buys, and that GGGs 150k buys was more successful and more profitable and based off that, it will make GGG the A side in negotiations for GGG vs the winner.:deal
This literally might be the dumbest post I've ever read. Do the math yourself, Cotto gets 10m+20% of PPV rev, and Canelo makes 6.5m. If they sell 700k they're clearly going to make profit, and more than GGG/Lemieux made. Did you fail 1st grade math or something? You claim GGG/Lemieux purse was like what 8m total but others are saying the purse was only 4m so let's calculate it with a 4m purse. The PPV did 150k*30 which is 4.5m. The gate did 2m+let's say 500k merch. That's 7.5m. That's a 3.5m profit. Cotto/Canelo if they do 700k*35=24.5m. Cotto makes 20% of that which rounds up to 5m+10m guaranteed. Add 6.5m and that's 21.5m on purses. Now let's say the other purses are around 500k, that's 22m, on purses 2.5m profit without gate+merch. Let's say they do HALF of what Lemieux/GGG did on merch+gate, that's 1.25m which amounts to 3.75m. Instead of doing your bull**** 1st grade lemonade nonsense try doing actual math.
It's definitely going to be on for us over here since Miura is Japanese, when we're lucky we get 3 fights, they always show loma over here, so for Floyd/Pac we got Santa Cruz/whatever bum he fought, Lomachenko/Rodriguez, but for GGG/Lemieux we only got Gonzalez/Viloria, and Floyd/Berto we got Groves/Jack.
They'll probably give you Rigo-Francisco as well, I'm not sure which of the other fights will be on the PPV Velez Vs Rios or Caballero Vs Haskins, I'm hoping for the latter, because neither of the former are really worthy.
Maybe Rigo was on tv over here last year for new years eve. I remember them hyping him up like a mofo, talking about how he's the best boxer right now, they had like a caption on the top right saying that Amagasa had like a 1/1000000 chance of winning lol, but that was on a completely different channel so idk. They even did a little all access, apparently Amagasa is a high school drop out who used to fight random people on the "streets" of Japan and started boxing at like 16/17 . They're not giving us velez vs rios or caballero vs haskins forsure. They only put on big names.