The only thing it reinforces is that your point is pointless. Also, the irony of your posts seems to be clearly going over your head.
Nah mate. You make an assumption then point out that somebody else is making assumptions. The point is more obvious than a brick wall in front of your face but you're way too stubborn to acknowledge it's there.
Bearing in mind that I only watched a six minute highlight: Fielding is absolute garbage. He was the disgrace. Fair enough, he was dehydrated and not at full strength, but he was the mug who agreed to Canelo's demand for a re-hydration clause. He looked soft, not fit; a long streak of misery. He was the belt holder, yet he gave up his belt for the money, gave up his name for the money, gave up his natural advantage at the weight for the money. Hell he let canelo outweigh him on the night of the fight. Not a fan of either guy.
Canelo taking an 'inbetween' fight is not a big deal. How long has Papa Al Haymon had multiple belt holders at Welter and not been able to throw together a unification fight? Terrence Crawford, the Charlo's etc fight nothing but 'inbetween' fights.
Fielding was a paper chump who sold his paper belt, I mean Canelo could have just farted on his face and Fielding would still hit the DECK !