Canelo fights well off the ropes?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BlueBottle, Sep 15, 2017.


  1. BlueBottle

    BlueBottle Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,268
    49
    Apr 23, 2010
    I do see that to be true but why? Why would a boxer perform better when their backward movement is restricted?
     
  2. Dreamking

    Dreamking Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    134
    Dec 24, 2015
    Ropes have some bend, it can mess with a boxers depth perception. Also boxers are like cornered animals, with the feeling of now where to run they might fight harder. Who knows i'm just speculating.
     
    BlueBottle likes this.
  3. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,010
    36,778
    Apr 17, 2011
    You can use the ropes to manipulate distance.
    Ive done it plenty of times in the gym.
     
    BlueBottle likes this.
  4. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
  5. BlueBottle

    BlueBottle Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,268
    49
    Apr 23, 2010
    Good answers guys, learn something new. So I guest ggg better pin canelo to the corners tomorrow
     
  6. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    Because the overconfident onrushing attacker, thinking that he has you on the run, can be baited into careless mistakes. It's like setting traps in chess where you seem to offer material for free but it isn't free at all but just part of an inescapable mating net.

    BTW

    Floyd made a career out of it. Trying to imitate him, the master of that technique, can be hazardous. Look at what happened to Broner vs Maidana.
     
  7. Gil Gonzalez

    Gil Gonzalez Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,607
    2,860
    Jun 15, 2012
    Liam Smith was lighting him up on the ropes, so no. Not really.
     
  8. BlueBottle

    BlueBottle Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,268
    49
    Apr 23, 2010
    Well, are fighters taught to attack differently when the opponent is on the ropes? It seems to me if you take same approach in attacking whether in the center or near the ropes and you can factor out the bending of the ropes, the attacker should have the advantage.
     
  9. junkhead

    junkhead My dogs watch me post Full Member

    2,918
    2,111
    Mar 26, 2015
    When I fought in the ams there were a few times I'd let the opponent back me into the ropes because when you're on the ropes or in a corner people tend to come forward and fight inside more. They're less inclined to fight from range, idk why, maybe it's psychological. But if i couldn't get around the jab or whatever I'd let them back me into a rope, cover up and they'd move in to try and land hooks through my guard, then I'd have them on the inside where I fought far better (**** reach ykno) and I'd just stick to them from there if I could.
     
    BlueBottle likes this.
  10. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017

    The attacking method always depends on whom you are fighting. How fast is he? How hard does he hit? Is he trying to deprive you of your best punching distance? If he's a slugger and you are winning on the outside, why would you suddenly fight him on the inside where he can connect more easily? So the reason why opponent goes to the ropes has to be considered.

    BTW
    Remember the Broner Maidana fight where Broner spent the first few rounds trying to imitate Mayweather on the ropes? Only Mayweather can be so successful because all his other attributes, hand speed, coordination, sense of timing, ability to anticipate intentions, are involved. Broner underestimated what was needed and paid the price.
    Canelo has tried it with limited success.
     
    BlueBottle likes this.