Canelo, GGG, Hopkins, Martinez and Taylor vs Old School MWs (Sweet Science)

Well. The way he defeated Tiberi makes me think that Toney's judges are at least the equal - if not better than - Canelo's judges.

 

Actually, a rather biting and smarmy comeback.

 

of course not, Tyson was not at his best,, however much you may think he was, we have to go with fact.

 

it was better than yours true, but weak in the grand scheme of things.

 

Reading Herol's comments is like shaving your brain with a cheese grater.

 

That Tyson and AJ thumbnail was pointing at modern heavyweights being bigger not better, this doesn`t apply to middles, the vid was asking how a heavyweight as small as Tyson could have been so much better than heavyweights his size from the past and how he could beat fighters that were around 6'3-6'5 in his prime and how he could compete with super heavies like AJ (before he got beat by a 6'2 fighter).

 

Hopkins was a master at setting up the right hand, Canelo is more skilled than Toney was and GGG would land far more than Taylor or Martinez would on Toney, those two don`t belong in this company at all.

 

explains a lot, but why is your brain made of cheese?

 

Nunn was clearly outboxing Toney.
A rather bad example.

 

Both GGG and Canelo were harder to hit than Nunn was v Toney, he was getting caufgt a lot, very open and wild, GGG would have landed more jabs than Nunn did in that bout. McCallum fought better v Toney than Nunn did.

 

Nunn was getting caught constantly by counters in that bout and couldn`t land his jab much, he had to fight on the inside which cost him.