Canelo: "Golovkin couldn't punch a hole in a paper beg"

He lost. you should get over it...

 

Have you recovered, and got over being on the losing side ?

 

Do me a favor and go back top the multiple threads that infested this forum before the fight saying how GGG was going to KO Canelo and get back to me. Don't get mad at me because Canelo proved to be tougher and better than people like you have him credit for.

 

Losing side? I scored the fight a draw. There was no winner in this fight alt.

 

the nature of your previous posts which strongly resembled those of a simpleton ...now you have verified it with the inane comments that appear to think will actually bother anyone ...lol poor weak minded folk

 

Then you cannot score ...with any amount of neutrality...how surprising.

 

I bet you jerk off to that clip every night before bed

 

You obviously don't live in reality. I could bump atleast 7 threads before the GGG-Canelo fight that said GGG would brutally KO Canelo. I might do it but why bother? You'll just ignore them or come back with another alt after being clowned.

 

"wouldnt" can mean the possibility of, not "didnt" obviously.

as well as an i i i test, you need to go back to school.

 

keep wit the childish retorts makes my case stronger Alter boy!

 

Ouch that hurt ...Classic.

 

That's a great clip, round 4 is a round that needs more attention here on the forum. Pretty much everyone I've heard gave the 4th round to Golovkin, including all 3 of the official judges. Even Byrd gave the 4th to Golovkin, yet I just re-watched the 4th round and no matter how many times I watch it, I see it as a close but clear round to Canelo.

I mean look at the number of flush hard jabs Canelo landed in this round. Compubox has Golovkin landing 1 more jab than Canelo, but this was a round that Canelo controlled the round with the jab and outlanded Golovkin in significant impactful jabs by a large margin. Especially the first half of the round it was all Canelo, Canelo was winning first half of the round clearly, but then then Canelo went back to the ropes for 30 seconds, and in that sequence Golovkin landed nothing big, just some glancing punching that didn't bother Canelo and were mostly picked up. Canelo landed some himself while he was on the ropes.

The 2nd half of the round was closer with Canelo retreating, but in backing away, GGG could not get into punching range enough to even up or win the round in my estimation.

Given what happened in the 4th round, and who landed the better punches (Canelo) and the better jabs (Canelo), if you give GGG the 4th round, then you're essentially giving GGG a round because you felt that Canelo "was running". This is an agenda by Abel Sanchez and GGG fans trying to rig the rematch so they get judges who gives GGG rounds if Canelo "runs" it's all an effort to make Canelo stand in front of Golovkin in the rematch which works to GGG's tactical advantage. Team GGG has to say this stuff because he knows how hard it is to win rounds when a guy like Canelo goes back to the ropes or moves away from punches.

What I'm trying to understand is why GGG fans are complaining about Canelo so-called "running" or moving away when in the first fight all 3 judges gave GGG the 4th round (even Byrd) and this is a round that Canelo should have won, but didn't get because he was so-called "running" towards the end of the round, right?

What are GGG fans complaininig about, about corrupt judging, when GGG already won a round that he didn't deserve in the first fight (round 4) because Canelo was moving away too much, went to the ropes for 30 seconds. Somebody especially a GGG fan please explain how the 4th round's scoring fits into your judging conspiracy about how there's such favorable scoring for Canelo when GGG won the 4th round on all 3 official scorecards. This was a round that Canelo controlled GGG from the start with clean hard impactful jabs, he landed the better punches, went to the ropes and picking off GGG's shots skillfully, coming back wtih some of his own, then in the final minute just backed away, prevented GGG from landing anything big.

There was a nice GGG right hand that hit Canelo on the chin, which was a counter to a Canelo jab that landed hard as well, that was probably GGG's best punch of the round, but it wasn't enough to give him a round after all those jabs and the kind of evasion techinques seen in that clip throughout the round by Canelo. Canelo got his Gloves on a lot of GGG's punches, some landed, but in a strictly quality punches landed comparison, Canelo should have won the round hands down.

But it was given to GGG. With all the complaining about the judges from the GGG camp, so what about this GGG fans, why did all the judges give GGG round 4 a round he didn't deserve. Because Canelo was running? Would you quantify it as corruption if all judges in concert don't score landed punches and give a guy a round simply because he was coming forward and the other guy was backing up? That seems to be round 4 in a nutshell.

 

Equally entertaining and sad at the same time.

 

what : that all 3 judges gave GGG round 4 when Canelo should have won it on quality landed punches? All 3 judges in concert giving a guy a round because his opponent was moving away in parts, and forgetting about who landed the better punches. Is that Corruption?

 

classiiic