Canelo is a coward

Because HBO would put a ****load of money into marketing the fight they know how good Ward is.:deal These guys would be doing way more media than for the Lemieux fight.

 

I think Ward-GGG would do about 300k-400k.

 

canelo is not a cowardzaghe.

 

Which is 3 times as much as GGG-lemieux both guys would get career high paydays. I actually think it could do 500K with all the marketing HBO would throw behind it.

 

If GGG beat Canelo and Ward beat Kovalev then in the future it could do even double.

 

True, but then again he'd be fighting a much riskier + bigger guy. Canelo/Cotto would make more and it'd be both far easier fights.

 

Boxing is garbage sport
All of them, Ward, GGG, Canello, especially CottoI are cowards.

Reinstating same day weigh ins makes sense

 

If Ward beats Kovalev, he is not coming down to 168. However, he will never beat Kovalev, because Andrea will avoid that fight at all costs.

 

There is a video of him saying only at 155.

 

155 sounds fair

 

canelo fougth mayweather, he is no cowardzaghe.

 

Yeah...for a voluntary fight between 2 guys from different weight classes.
Not for Canelo who's been fighting at mw for his last 3 fights, comes in around same weight as GGG on fight night and now paying fees to fight for 160 BELT.

Canelo's actions show us he's a middleweight, campaigning at middleweight. End of story. atsch

 

I agree.

If they reinstated same-day weigh ins, Canelo would be a super middleweight.

He's 168 pounds right now, and he's in great shape. Moving the weigh-ins to 36 hours before a fight, instead of the day of the fight turned out to be a terrible idea.

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/canelo-currently-at-167-8-pounds-310795

 

GGG doesn't walk around heavier than Ward, Moron. In fact, Ward likely walks around 12-15 lb heavier than Golovkin. Go back to school and learn to form proper an@logies.

This is beside the fact that Canelo is fighting for and might be holding a belt to which GGG is mandatory. Ward isn't mandatory to a belt GGG has. Yet another point of fact missing from your false an@logy.