canelo "khan and kirkland earnt fight with me ggg has not"

Sure buddy.. You guys keep telling yourselves that. His oppoenents are not in Canelo's opponents skill level.

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

 

Same guy that is now an underdog vs. Golovkin victim Lemieux? :?

 

Yes, he got knocked out by Ishida, struggled to beat a shockingly bad Angulo and got a very lucky DQ win against Molina.

Basically he looked very fragile, just like Khan has many times, look fragile and earn a shot at the great Canelo.

 

Ya man that's awesome...what an accomplishment. ...since Canelo's resume is made up of welterweights and jr middles.....lol


Why would MWs fight weltereights?

 

Good question, ask Canelo.

 

How many fights does canelo have at mw?

 

Not sure why ur laughing ...I've never said that

One would be foolish to think that ....I think when people say Canelo's resume is better it's in relative terms.....

 

Is the phrase "that was then, this is now" not familiar to you?

You've been on a ****-post run lately, it might be time to take a break.:good

 

So you're saying that defeating Glen Tapia when Kirkland did was a worthy enough accomplishment to land a date with Canelo, trumping anything Golovkin has done, but that he is now shot to bits and deteriorated enough to be an underdog versus Lemieux?

That's your assertion?

 

U said alot of you fruitcakes ...if u didn't want to imply me as one of them u prob should have said alot of fruitcakes

 

Alternately, he could just think you a fruitcake in general and the statement would still apply as worded without him thinking you in particular held that opinion. #syntax