Not at all. The only time I chime in about GGG is when there is factually incorrect information being propagated.
How would beating Rocky Fielding or shot Kovalev would enchase his legacy. for example, nobody gives Cotto a credit for beating a corpse of Martinez. History is not kind to cheap moves like that. Who gives a credit to Lebedev for KOing shot RJJ? Berbick beat Ali, he got no credit for it
Pacquiao gets credit for beating Margarito, Morales, De La Hoya, Mosley, and Hatton, Diaz. Fighters who were equally as done or much more done. He also gets credit for controversial wins against Marquez. So yes, I think history will be very kind to Canelo's resume.
I must say Big Red did take a bigger risk with Krusher than Rocky so I give him credit for the 175 jump. As a matter of fact you had me convinced Krusher stood a good chance to upset Canelo. I think Canelo knows he is jumping and grabbing the weakest links but tbh at the end of the day he is making history. still want to see him get KTFO
the very next sentence in the post you just quoted, the part you specifically removed, answers your question. he is being talked about as the current p4p #1, he has the most lucrative contract ever in sports, and just barely hitting his prime. and he did this without the insight of your ideas about how and who he should be fighting. your opinion doesnt matter.
In the end opinion of the boxing fans is all that matters. Canelo already has a terrible reputation and it's just a matter of time before DAZN will drop that cheating сunt.
At least when GGG fights his opponents always get an even break. Theyre not fighting The State Commission & Vegas boxing officials as well as the roided ginger one
Just curious, how come you always have to bring in Pacquiao as an example or measurement to almost all of your posts regardless of the topic? Are you obsessed with Boxing or Pacquiao ? Just wondering....