Canelo said he's considering a fight with Trout if he can't get Mayweather

Only thing Canelo fears about Trout is the paycheck.

 

Is this meant to be English ?

 

Id favor trout

 

He's BORING BORING BORING. If I wasn't such a die-hard fan, I'd NEVER watch his fights, MW. He has Paul Pender's style 'n charisma.

 

i did not know that!
he learned it from watching floyd?


what i dont get everybody gives the kid **** about fighting jr ww (my self included & rightly so) but the kid seems like he is finally trying to step it up here.
looks like if theres going to be a risk of losing involved he wants it to be floyd.


guerrero at least has tested himself to try & get the floyd fight i suppose.
I would just rather see can yellow vs ****** mayweather...

 

you saying angulo scarred of canelo?
i dont think he is... prolly should be but i doubt angulo is smart enough to know that canelo could box his ears off.


Angulo vs the kid would be a good fughtmuch better than trout vs canelo
but golden boy wouldnever put "Can_Yellow" in with a Live Puncher like "EL PERRO" NEVER!!

 

I don't think Trout will get the call...too risky for Canelo. But, I'd love to see it.

 

no, mosseylennon.

ive given you my reasoning and its sound reasoning at that. tell me how kirkland(gbp fighter who is expendable unlike canelo) was ahead on gale van hoyes scorecard of the molina fight?

thats what im up against and why i need three fights.

take the three fight boxrec if youre that confident with canelo.

and by the way, im not the one here praising the greatness of trout just the ordinariness of canelo.

 

bundrage is a gbp fighter so ishe is going to have to completely dominate to get the decision because hes not going to (t)ko k9 as he doesnt have the power.

the only reason why i think oscar doesnt have canelo fight the 39-year-old, 5'6" k9 is that hes a detroit fighter and these guys are known for ktfo or gktfo trying.

like i said, canelo shouldve already fought molina(to get exposure and real fight experience at 154) and now hes going to have to step up against guys that want to beat that ass and are in no way afraid of canelo.

you could almost make a case that canelo has been "sparring" for that last year and a half(rhodes was his only legitimate defense as he came to fight and was not at some severe disadvatage like the rest of his opponents).

 

Can yellow has been fighting , soft hand picked opposition !Won his title off of a welterweight ! Over hyped and over protected by GBP ! Time to step it up !

 

Well it seems you don't know what a fair bet is, I offered you other ways of judging through ESB from educated posters who are unbiased, if your not happy with that I doubt you think Canelo is ordinary but just hate him, and can't think logically.

 

who are these "educated posters" that you are talking about that are unbiased?

just take the bet. three top five boxrec.com wins before a loss.

is it that hard?

if canelo is so great as you guys proclaim, he wont have a problem doing this especially with gbp having their hands in the judges pockets.

what youre essentially telling everyone here is that your guy cant beat three legit top five boxrec.com 154's without losing.

i think broner is the real deal. i'll make a lifetime esb ban bet that he doesnt lose before he beats three top five boxrec.com opponents in his respected weight class.

see, now how hard was that?

is this "logical" enough for you? just judges and no "unbiased" and "educated posters" and only a clear-cut winner and loser.

someone leaves the forum and someone stays.

its that simple and that "logical."

 

He's been singing the same old story for the past year now. Within that time he's taken on old Mosley and Lopez.

When the contract with Trout gets signed then I will give him credit.

But for now I don't see that happening. Trout is too much of a risk. I can see him even beating Canelo even. Why would Canelo fight him? You dont just jump from fighting old Mosley and Lopez to Trout haha. The #2. Dream on...

 

You pick Em, but no Cubans.

Stop putting words in my mouth ,I'm not telling anyone anything about Canelo not beating the top 3 or 5 whatever the **** your talking about, you make stupid bets and come up with crazy reasoning when no one accepts.

Broners division is a different story, if he moves up your on.

I'm also beginning to think your an idiot or a teen,
Either way you and logic are in different hemispheres.

 

what are these stupid bets and crazy reasoning im talking about? please elaborate.

an idiot or a teen? im on a fm-3(soon to be temporal residente) here in mexico at 45 years of age.

you know what thats all about, right?

seems like youre the one getting mad right now all emotional while im cool, calm and collected.

now are you going to take the bet or not? yes or no. its really that simple.

just like the broner bet. yes or no. no moving up or "educated posters" or "unbiased" judging.

yes or no.

by the way, trout would probably be a +250 against canelo. does that seem "fair" and "logical" to you?