You've got to admit, shadow is dedicated to his fantasy (if he's for real), or his craft (if he's trolling). My Masters Thesis was around 33,000 words. In this thread alone, shadow has made 65 posts with approximately 24,000 words. And that's just this thread. Dedication !
The only fantasy in here is the dismissive and denial attitude of GGG defenders who are dedicated to claiming that the quotes must be fake. The same people who deny that Canelo beat GGG. The only thing FAKER than GGG himself and his "two faced" persona are his FANS!
What delusion would that be? Revealing what GGG said about Canelo? Showing why Canelo called him fake? GGG has a lot of people fooled. You and others go to bat for him. I do not. It's about time the truth comes out about GGG.
I thought the Charlo's were lions only? So Is G fighting one of the Charlo's? Are Canelo and G planning a play date at Lion Country safari? Who is the cowardly lion? I'm so confused right now.
Well let's look at the facts of the matter. The video has an anonymous voice over and cut's clips from an interview. Now for me to feel comfortable I would like to see these words coming out of GGG's mouth and not a voice over asserting things that are outside of GGG's persona. Secondly I have an extention on Firefox that allows me to view dislikes on YouTube and guess what numb nut's That's right it appears that the majority of people think it's bollocks with 302 likes v 333 dislikes. Now you might retort that I'm appealing to authority which we both know is a fallacy that I regularly clown you with (Canelo v Bivol judges scores) however viewers on YouTube are not an authority it is however a majority consensus. Also I don't accept that you are "Sharing" as you quote the same later in in the post with lol emoji's. So like your flat earth proofs that I systematically annihilate with ease using logic you then try and distance yourself as if you came across it by accident while I know you cherry pick to find something that fit's your narrative. Exhibit 1. I recently explained that I could see ISS clearly with my telescope you then did a search on YouTube and picked the one video where the guy could barely get an image. Yet when I searched I found 6 videos that proved my position on the first page. The point I'm making is that you specifically picked the ONLY video on the front page where the result was negative. That demonstrates your willingness to be deceptive and present information in a devious manner. What you've presented here is also bollocks and shows that you are a weasel. /Thread
I can tell you're confused. What Canelo said has nothing to do with the Charlos and their Lions only brand. The quote that Canelo has used before is what they often say in the gym : "It is not the same when you call for the lion than when you actually see him coming towards you." He said it before he fought Saunders last year. It's a saying that means fighters might talk a lot of stuff about you but it's different when they see the "lion" coming towards you. Saunders was talking a big game about coming to win and acting all confident before the fight, but we saw what happened when he met the lion in the ring. It's different when the lion is coming at you. When you're calling for the lion you might act tough and talk all kinds of stuff, but then the moment comes where you have to fight, then the talking stops.
Since we're talking facts, the fact is that if you watch the first video of that channel, all the text and comments are in Russian, and you hear a human voice narrating speaking Russian. So what does that tell us? That tells us that it's a Russian boxing channel with a host that speaks Russian who is probably based in Russia. You wouldn't expect a Russian to speak English fluently enough to use his own voice to narrate an English video. He mis-spelled "poisoned" which is something that a Russian who didn't speak English too well would do, who translated the content to English in that video and used a computer generated English voice to narrate since he doesn't speak English well enough. I too would like to see those words coming out of GGG's mouth, the problem is we can't find the interview that is shown in that video elsewhere. But the apparent interview appears to exist as actual clips are shown of it during the video. The lack of being able to find THAT interview that is shown in the video leaves us in limbo. On the one hand, we don't have that video to hear what GGG said, on the other hand we do see clips from an interview in that video that apparently no one on here has seen. So while we can't verify its authenticity, we also can't discount the interview's existance either since clips from an interview are shown in the video. Now it would be wrong to 100% pretend like we know for a fact that GGG said that, but at the same time it would also be wrong to automatically assume that it's fake and rule out the possibility that he may have said that when clearly we see clips from an intereview than apparently no one has seen and we have clips from the corner in the rematch that confirm what was said about the water bottle change in the exact round that it happened in. So I suggest rather than jumping to conclusions and claiming that you know that it's fake, you take a more pragmatic approach, keep an open mind, and consider the circumstantial evidence and not rule out the possibility that he could have said that. Take this opportunity to learn from your previous mistakes of jumping to conclusions based on your gut feeling which has turned out to be wrong time annd time again, and this time, don't put yourself in such a precarious situation by claiming it's fake and then leaving yourself open to looking stupid again if it turns out to be real.
Odds are very few fighters are actually nice guys. Who gives a damn? I watch sports for the athletes' abilities, not their personalities. I could care less if I ever hear another athlete speak.