Canelo Says Golovkin Should Take The Low Ball Offer...

I don't have to explain that. First of all, my explanation would be nothing but my take, and NOT an actual account, which is how you would try to take it, since you take the words of posters so diligently as as gospel.

Second, he doesn't fight fatigues or look drained, WHICH is how you can tell. You have nothing to base your theory on b*tchm, and you know it. All you are going on is the hunch of some hating c*nt....that being you.

When he actually looks drained and fights lethargic, let me know.

 

you really have to love it...one thing one day...something else the next day....it would be so funny if it werent so sad

 

Who the **** says it more beneficial? Just because he stays in shape for 160, means in your empty head, that he can NOW make 155 with ease? Even if he could make 155, there's no need. It's not a weight class you smelly c*cnt.

 

Some fighters don't do catchweights c*cnt. Remember many years back when everyone hated catchweights? Now you suck them like their d*cks!! For shame ASOl....

 

I do not like catchweights at all. But I'm being realistic here. If Ggg is smaller than Canelo, and he needs/wants the Canelo fight/payday, the obvious thing is to compromise and meet him at a CW. He gets the win, the money, and his stock shoots through the roof.

If Ggg can KO any LHW, and also needs a marquee name on his resume, and start building a legacy, doesn't it make sense to move up and get that win on his resume?

Do you guys even attempt use common sense and logic when you come up with your absurd arguments?

 

this would be where one of them says something like "i bet you didnt have a problem with hopkins resume 18 years ago" or something like it

 

STFU with that..I'm being realistic... You don't get to pretend to be realistic when you say sh*t like, "Liam Smith wiould be 3G's most credible win." That makes you sound like a f*ckin fool. And you only said it because canelo just beat Smith. What a crock of sh*t....

I don't care about the "who's smaller" garbage....both guys are essentially the same size, and you know it. But if some poster says 3g is smaller, you jump on that because that's what you do, argue stupid sh*t.

Tired of idiots who think moving up is how you build a legacy. I guess you think Broner is more respected and has a better legacy because of his "4" division titles, as opposed to 3G's one.

 

Neither you nor Isal were watching boxing 18 years ago. Isal was maybe 4, and it's doubtful you were born.

 

Im a GGG fan but if the offer is 10m + a cut of the PPV he should absolutely take it. If he wins the fight like most expect he can call the shots on a rematch and rake in some serious cash. If he kos Canelo in the first fight Canelo would have no choice but to fight a rematch to regain his status as the top guy in the sport as far as cash cow goes.

 

They said let's talk about purse split percentages didn't they. Golden Boy said "No fight must marinate first. Flat fee is career highest purse for GGG so no reason for any percentage split".

It simply shows Golden Boy does not want the fight now. They want to milk Canelo vs. some less risky fighters first. Makes sense.

 

There was no upside, just the 10mill flat fee. Drenlu isn't very adept to research.

 

I highly doubt a flat fee includes an additional cut from the ppv. It wouldn't be a flat fee otherwise.

 

didnt golovkin get 5 mil plus 0 ppv money vs brook? i think thats what i heard....can anyone confirm or deny this?

 

Do some research of your own c*nt. Maybe then you'll stop posting lies so much...

 

The covers the PPV upside in which GGG will make millions more off of.

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2016/09/de-la-hoya-golovkins-not-happy-offer-good-luck/