**Canelo the best Mexican fighter of all time? Will be better than JCC**

Whatever you say bro, at the end of the day Canelo owns Ggg and Mayweather owns Pacquiao, and Canelo will rank way higher than ggg ever will in ATG.Deal with it now go cry to your moms closet

 

JCC is gracious, I don't think Canelo passed him yet. It looks like he will in terms of quality wins.

I also disagree that JCC tarnished his reputation by fighting too long. I think that's part of his greatness, facing incredible odds and fighting for the people who felt he represented them.

It was ridiculous to do it, but being ridiculous doesn't make it any less of a legendary show of toughness.

 

hes as tainted as his meat

 

How many peds did JCC do?

Did JCC weight drain his opponents and impose advantageous rehydration clauses on them?

Did he always get favourable judging and did he stack his wraps, spring short camps on his opponents and fight old and shot fighters for name value?

Somebody refresh my memory.

JCC > Canelo

 

I feel he's probably already there but always need time of retrospect.

 

If they're both frauds what does that make the fighters who all lost to them? I guess they must be pure trash since they couldn't beat mere frauds.

 

you've got a serious hang up with fighters who don't fight like you want them too.
pac's a warrior, nobody can deny that, but he's a warrior that got completely nullified by floyd.

 

i agree with what you say.
fighters often fight past their expiry date, but i don't equate fighting past prime with a loss of legacy.

 

That's what he does and if a fighter he likes more loses to a fighter he doesn't like he will make excuses cry and try and discredit the win. He talked **** about Charlo both of them but Evil Twin avenged his loss he had nothing to say. When Big Twin beat up Chenko he had nothing to say. When Canelo beat GGG in the rematch he was full of excuses same with Ward against Kovalev in the rematch and Calzaghe against Hopkins. He will never give credit to fighters he doesn't like period no matter what they do or who they beat. In his mind they're only successful because of judges commissions and conspiracies. He's crazy and has issues.

 

so is jon jones and roy jones, but they are still great fighters.

 

my mind just spins though....
what is his pay-off from repeating himself?

he's literally hitting his head against a wall.

 

Says the same stupid **** over and over and talks like he's 14 yet he's 60+. He acts like if he repeats it over and and over it means it's true and those loses didn't happen. He has a hard time dealing with and accepting reality. He needs help, real talk.

 

it really surprised me when i realised he was older than he appeared.
i can't wrap my head around how someone that is older than me (if he is) can keep repeating the same stuff and using the caps lock 'ROFLMAO' defence to justify his posts.

 

Maybe. JCC was no joke though.

87-0 before his first draw and 89-0-1 before his first loss. 26-0-1 in world title fights before his first loss and 31-4-2 in world title fights when he retired. No other fighter has that many world title fight victories. Yes, he beat some bums prior to winning a world title and he beat some bums in between title defenses... but he beat a lot of good fighters too. He won world titles at 130, 135, and 140. He fought for word titles at 147 but the best he could do was a questionionable draw vs. Whitaker in his 88th pro fight.

I guess it comes down to who you prefer. I like both, hard pick, I will go with Chavez for now.

 

ROFL !! Go study Boxing 101 Then you wont make such a fool of yourself again Pumpkin