Canelo vs GGG Rematch

I don't know if it's sad or funny how you blatantly twist statements into what you want them to say, as you obviously did here.

 

In all fairness, I think Shadow's posts tonight have been pretty fair, no nuthuggery, just honest boxing analysis.

I went GGG fight one, am 50/50 on this one. Either guy can make adjustments and I had GGG winning fight 1, but another 8 months could just tilt the balance a bit.

 

What I did there was apply the logic of the aftermath of the first fight to the statement. As you know, we've heard widespread claims of corruption not only due the one-sidedness of Byrd's card, but also (as many have claimed) because G didn't win. Due to the backlash coming out of the first fight, I asked and generally wonder whether or not Canelo can win a decision in the rematch and it not be labelled corruption.

It was good to read that Ukansodoff recognized being paranoid and saying that no more corruption is about to happen in Vegas. However it seems that in many fans minds, perceived fairness and lack of corruption is directly tied to Triple G winning.

 

Anyone who starts off with...."So you are saying..." tend to twist things to their agenda.

 

You're attempts at misrepresenting me as a poster and how you view Canelo are failing miserably. I've shown a willingness to engage on the issues. We're obviously coming at this from different perspectives, you're a Triple G fan, I'm a Canelo fan. OK so you're obviously trying to cast Canelo and anyone supports him in a negative light. It's lame and played out, you really should try to get some new material.

 

You're generalizing. It was part of a question, asking whether or not there not being corruption could involve Canelo winning a decision.

 

Thank you, I've tried to put out pretty fair straightforward no-nonsense boxing analysis. It's really amazing how often I am pressed and even insulted for simply trying to discuss the bout rationally. But whatever, haters gonna hate, anyone is more than welcome to come at me.

 

Never understood when fans pick a fighter to win by SD. Are you trying to guess the judges scorecard or something?

I figured one would be giving their prediction of the fight, not your prediction of the judges scorecards.

 

It's usually the same people who make personal attacks. People who are unreasonably infatuated with certain fighters. You have demonstrated that you know how to analyze, breakdown, and score fights. some people with agenda's do not like that if it goes against their narrative.

 

Good ol' Lance, always chiming in with his negativity.

 

Good ol Isal...acting like a lil girl